Re: [rmcat] draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, test case 4.4 RMCAT Flow competing with a long TCP Flow

Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82561A6EF0 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQzYugS7U03d for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624A01A07C7 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79036d00000126a-8d-5360e37aac3f
Received: from ESESSHC015.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 99.54.04714.A73E0635; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:50:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB307.ericsson.se ([169.254.7.20]) by ESESSHC015.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.63]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:50:17 +0200
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, test case 4.4 RMCAT Flow competing with a long TCP Flow
Thread-Index: Ac9jf090kpDicEcGShCy4a8kghdQ6gAK9R2AAAia8FAAJv0GcA==
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:50:17 +0000
Message-ID: <E0F7A68B07B53F4FBD12DABD61CBA90E126F127F@ESESSMB307.ericsson.se>
References: <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA31F5BD0F@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se> <F399C574-037C-4F74-80D6-4639FC529C56@cisco.com> <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA31F5BDA6@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA31F5BDA6@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E0F7A68B07B53F4FBD12DABD61CBA90E126F127FESESSMB307erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7V44Rgg/7l0hbv151hs3j/md9i 9c0PbBYzTnBYvG5ZxuTA6jHl90ZWj7PLpjJ5LFnykymAOYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY167VMGD uYwVn/9PYGtgPNjL2MXIySEhYCLxeXIrE4QtJnHh3no2EFtI4CijxOm7CV2MXED2YkaJa2fe AhVxcLAJ2Eg8XuwHUiMikCQxsXsBC0gNs8AvRonG6Y/YQWqEBfIlJt8ph6gpkGhbMIURwnaS 6Nj/mhXEZhFQlbg3ZQdYnFfAV+LslKMsEHuPMErM2VcDYnMK+EmsnXcWrJ4R6Lbvp9aA3cks IC5x68l8qJsFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpJYsf0SI0R9vsSs3tUsELsEJU7OfMIygVF0FpJR s5CUzUJSBhHXk7gxdQobhK0tsWzha2YIW1dixr9DLMjiCxjZVzGKFqcWF+emGxnrpRZlJhcX 5+fp5aWWbGIExuTBLb91dzCufu14iFGAg1GJh7f4S2SwEGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4WJXHetrvewUIC 6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYFdcGel/m2uy17ZJ9wlxtqYuRKYvFliod2iw+r1rv 2rcvxs2XpDfHG0/Uc4rKjlzbLbnQaMMsDlvNB6dEn337EMHBtMHBYbulT+wBAcHjp4+4zF/W vCS388idB8lT97OeNi0TLF7xjbOwoFDD3kQ96uz9M5MWRAU+EtKRe+v8metbvdU/dd5yJZbi jERDLeai4kQAABzdDKoCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/XLIhSQIoHYzG-OXL1pmKQEJLAQ8
Cc: "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>, Erlendur Karlsson <erlendur.karlsson@ericsson.com>, "varun@comnet.tkk.fi" <varun@comnet.tkk.fi>, "Michael Ramalho (mramalho)" <mramalho@cisco.com>, "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, test case 4.4 RMCAT Flow competing with a long TCP Flow
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:50:25 -0000

Hi Fred and Ingemar,

Are you saying re-ordering is not a phenomena that we can observe in the current Internet? And we should not have test cases to handle re-ordering of packets in RMCAT?
BR

Zahed

From: Ingemar Johansson S
Sent: den 29 april 2014 10:59
To: Fred Baker (fred)
Cc: rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org); Erlendur Karlsson; Zaheduzzaman Sarker; varun@comnet.tkk.fi; Michael Ramalho (mramalho); Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
Subject: RE: [rmcat] draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, test case 4.4 RMCAT Flow competing with a long TCP Flow

Hi Fred
You are right, it should actually be a FIFO queue involved in the random delay, I asked about this internally and the impression then was that we should allow for reordering to happen, did not think about the TCP problem then though....
In any case if a random delay is still used for test case 4.4 and 4.5 then it could be good to clarify this.

/Ingemar

From: Fred Baker (fred) [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
Sent: den 29 april 2014 10:02
To: Ingemar Johansson S
Cc: rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org<mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>); Erlendur Karlsson; Zaheduzzaman Sarker; varun@comnet.tkk.fi<mailto:varun@comnet.tkk.fi>; Michael Ramalho (mramalho); Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
Subject: Re: [rmcat] draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, test case 4.4 RMCAT Flow competing with a long TCP Flow


On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:57 AM, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com<mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:

Hi

I am experimenting  with the bottleneck test cases and found an issue with the competing TCP flows test case.

This test case specifes a Maximum end to end jitter = 30ms. This is implemented as a uniform [0-30ms] random delay in my simulator setup.
The problem with this is that it creates so much reordering that TCP will trigger CWND reduction, and I guess this is not the intention or ?

My recommendation is that we should remove the random delay completely in this test case (and also in 4.5)  as the FTP will introduce plenty of jitter anyhow.

That's the problem with simulations; you really have to think about how to make them similar to whatever they are simulating. Network gear rarely uses non-FIFO queues; even when we have parallel queues for various classes of traffic, the sub-queues are FIFO.

If your simulated queuing system isn't FIFO, its results don't tell us much about what rmcat will do in real networks.

/Ingemar

=================================
Ingemar Johansson  M.Sc.
Senior Researcher

Ericsson AB
Wireless Access Networks
Labratoriegränd 11
971 28, Luleå, Sweden
Phone +46-1071 43042
SMS/MMS +46-73 078 3289
ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com<mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
www.ericsson.com<x-msg://85/www.ericsson.com>

"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others."  Groucho Marx<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/groucho_marx.html>
=================================

-----------------------------------
"We are learning to do a great many clever things...The next great task
will be to learn not to do them."

- G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936)