IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> Fri, 06 September 2019 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD28120BE6; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bnBIGKnW; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=L90ectVa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXOsb4DpmUMK; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEC91208B5; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2932; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567786942; x=1568996542; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZmEV+awEZE0Liibb56h0z/iTa26JIu8glDHgXzhWz5g=; b=bnBIGKnWzOR1xShOxQm/5AVXR/3MEe68Ta7Qkc0P8iPS+rjM61Eq/zlp SKx/YpG71wRniw7IumMv6tJgedo6SMkBYjCCU3+mVKWSBO7o4sFAIMqei OkbclDzinQzFriQno1I6mocnMF8WZM7f949Uns3K+Ebst0iLrUg04zkc2 k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:1rJ4/RxBye+6ngnXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YhWN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZuVCET8NezqcgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BQBwAKh3Jd/5JdJa1lHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBZ4FFUANtViAECyqEIYNHA4pzgjeYEoFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQEjCgIBAYQ/AheCICM4EwIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS4MhUsCAQMSEREMAQE3AQ8CAQgaAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBSKDAAGBagMdAQ6eBAKBOIhhc4Eygn0BAQWBNgKDWBiCFgMGgQwoi3gYgUA/gREnDBOCTD6CYQEBA4FGGIMLMoImjzucGmgKgiCGfYghgViDexuCNJZHjX2BOIZIkGQCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkhgVhwFTsqAYJBgkKDcoUUhT9zgSmPSgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,473,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="626416298"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Sep 2019 16:22:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (xch-aln-020.cisco.com [173.36.7.30]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x86GMLKM005054 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:22:21 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (173.36.7.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 11:22:20 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 11:22:20 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 11:22:20 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GQG5sPFrloASUOIN+RcWKN9/w2/V4D1VIjGPTzddh3ZfFp86owWEt2fvKGGNidgNbbeyRV5r2HlhYv/DaXf7OJ71hpnyX1P/0vWV9//jtl5rT6PJNGcm1d5oHICfRyZxefJV8JJVsNNTtWRopEhTHhBwa8TEaGoYBTGtGL9+hpZBSXlOUjz5USUdclxx2X8hJ975cKeJal5k38xk+watZByLnDBWcg6JgD0keqV1eYcKEQncNV1+oxjSK6odQnumM32/gBAVsJxiLE5ZfyCQXzlQdP/4IB+LWKG5hYdCDF3RyA3bxbyFfiHrojkHYKAL73/90FhNLPoTMq6IlEEHNw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZmEV+awEZE0Liibb56h0z/iTa26JIu8glDHgXzhWz5g=; b=P/XYv1VnXOWaQkdapvYPFy7xPoE60ma1mtzWvfEyuQJXLQVhwkpCX5Wlr8MjXlXhjOOIiXTvezFAnBv2OH/M6wpRRuAQaWQouSgY9mchlNr32B4EwDXwen2Xjr29XyqYveMDR/YO+hfMhKyGh3vLe+V85tupdSg3CxGsvpPK2voFctQRvHX91bRsdNXNlN5kUn6xBaykti75dvkoIJCENgWDhfnVU17ttVDK2Z6pITrxqnpPiosVtBvCDdS9jnH3+IkdWEzyKW1b/qvC2ewVThLC0XaZSUvuZxNkC/5LzXwVpZVc/h3LPTPK9dCMOsXz6Fk+GBmu4dA5B0kMk4HX9g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZmEV+awEZE0Liibb56h0z/iTa26JIu8glDHgXzhWz5g=; b=L90ectVadCUvEsNN3OFGItQnAZi+jgryDkxbfqpgTxRX9XW6NBoJLA/itXInwYS5k6d86A6TfKeV+Zj600gVfKPXJ53TLK8+Sv2JmBVenxYjdE3w1iK8NNpZfJdzFqguEBqfkqzH42o8i4oRs1dvShzTgIWTTOuLegFerg4Px64=
Received: from CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.72.140) by CY4PR11MB1286.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.173.16.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2220.19; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:22:19 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::53:33f3:ea63:7f72]) by CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::53:33f3:ea63:7f72%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2199.027; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:22:19 +0000
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rmcat-nada.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12
Thread-Index: AQHVX9RhTvB5ACBSt0aorlE+TR0wk6cZq7yAgATfSgA=
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:22:19 +0000
Message-ID: <BFACBCC8-0D26-480D-8489-C92F2B67D885@cisco.com>
References: <156723937469.15325.11710425059607223952@ietfa.amsl.com> <BE9766EC-DC89-44E8-BCAA-69B1A900D51A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE9766EC-DC89-44E8-BCAA-69B1A900D51A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=xiaoqzhu@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:1402:1250:3d62:80e8:fc02:e64c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8a70e680-b832-40e4-9ddd-08d732e663ba
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR11MB1286;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB1286:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB1286D618ECE1CD3B72515193C9BA0@CY4PR11MB1286.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0152EBA40F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(14444005)(14454004)(6116002)(2906002)(86362001)(25786009)(966005)(478600001)(102836004)(71190400001)(76176011)(71200400001)(53546011)(66946007)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(2501003)(6506007)(76116006)(91956017)(5660300002)(4326008)(6436002)(6512007)(81166006)(316002)(6246003)(476003)(46003)(33656002)(58126008)(305945005)(11346002)(2616005)(8936002)(6306002)(7736002)(81156014)(446003)(8676002)(229853002)(256004)(53936002)(486006)(110136005)(54906003)(36756003)(6486002)(186003)(99286004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB1286; H:CY4PR11MB1559.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dSj0GUc+zDLK4TvhV7Vno4lMLDVMBObupwUV81qx8LxRO9hnlJ2ISmSQ4ecEkhXjDH7/XTqqKPS7VJM1cg8wVK3C50HFAweUCh5qWwa02bAQhpxsNqMOhlVlvUX7ZdnOEV/hwmV2FVoEiKiNNhlxSHCw4HYBkHG/niwPGPdw313no9R/NkgZGjXvNMazUpdHZ0f7qF/BoKU5ob9O1jfuXqLQ015nJHodWe7KixHo1SpsgxotDDC12tHlOtVHBP4j/YrEqYyPQnqFm/+7H+BhqFC8YdtAHo8rffKHsEEg8XPmHy1iKM6W4hZ76J2SUtXcVJCydWK9jaZlIilnH3K5IvFNz3kB9MiKTbCwXMQ9FcijdANKQhBwYbfWTqeWtOU1MxxPXZOY2wZVe+KjXN4KiAmFvm+A+WU8fHiMa0CYZ6U=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A4CA00EA5CD9C743AF2AFECA2EC39338@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8a70e680-b832-40e4-9ddd-08d732e663ba
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2019 16:22:19.1326 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: bKs+5hfDpp0IE1HIxvQV8ZOEm6pjVe6YJrj3RcMUrxsAgar/RKyNl56k/dnNrzLY4Btzv54YpIIMrMr9LMPcFw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB1286
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.30, xch-aln-020.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/g_1x4P0sGFbIYWPuRfU3ZMY4AHc>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-12
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:22:25 -0000

Update: the revised draft (link below) has removed the extraneous reference of draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-13

Thanks again, Sheng, for your review on this draft. 

Best,
Xiaoqing

On 9/3/19, 8:58 AM, "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> wrote:

    Thanks a lot for your review and for catching the glitch in the reference list.  Will fix that in the next revision. 
    
    Best,
    Xiaoqing
     
    
    On 8/31/19, 3:16 AM, "Sheng Jiang via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    
        Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
        Review result: Has Nits
        
        I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
        effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
        were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF
        drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD
        reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
        these comments just like any other last call comments.
        
        This experimental document describes an experimental congestion control scheme 
        called network-assisted dynamic adaptation (NADA). The sender regulates its
        sending rate based on either implicit or explicit congestion signaling. The
        document has only described the mechanism and algorithms. This does NOT define
        any massage format, massage exchanging procedure, etc. therefore, it is NOT a
        traditional standard document which is mainly for inter-operation purpose.
        Based on the assumption that such document was also suitable to be published as
        a RFC, I think this document is clear and well-written.
        
        There are a small Nit: draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model (published as RFC
        8593) has been defined as a reference, but not been quoted in the main text.
        
        Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
        Review result: Has NITs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email