IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] rmcat minutes

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27A1ACDF5 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNn1jO7x8-K8 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241CF1ACD27 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagg8 with SMTP id g8so39646292lag.1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uo/WNOG4akuxflHh8bCuRucox0lyx7e2VS5cFOHpulk=; b=ZNyki9ut24MFYh2jLdxZ4x41Zr9mN0RvA+/n051e/9fu2EXazWC9vig59MJAyVadCi pAM9GZfj7Vwo18H66INWJiQG4JZtKoEcsKG/HWYfT+YCSlfj8/T6RrORyT0tRzUozMmK IkOjD7us+w8FqE5Iq5R4Sk6WUsF96/f75tjqhwsYHuoyws+4YT/5k89Mx8DywLCSrJ+e M2a6mtOZoEwZ6JHjeg5PmR1zvgDKF/gh3xq9gYGBn0ocwq3XjWTLsBc0FYohznRladNC pyeuSpW4u0sZBIbfEywrvQ/+raueUU+PawaYfZYrifxYvFiBBgJZbtDKmHy8WI0pcgIz cdew==
X-Received: by 10.152.37.228 with SMTP id b4mr35696047lak.111.1427902336630; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.176.225 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D14181EA.4B166%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <2A8439D2-8A6A-4230-8015-0CE0540EAD64@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <D14181EA.4B166%mzanaty@cisco.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:31:56 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrxrMMMANehbp7SPUnSffSdWEa-YpJhuZG-zZnq+pgYkQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/y7FitnoMYmpOWEuJpUf78rlmsTg>
Cc: "Karen E. E. Nielsen" <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>, "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" <rmcat@ietf.org>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] rmcat minutes
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:32:20 -0000

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <mzanaty@cisco.com> wrote:
> Can the chairs please clarify this part?
>
>> on splitting rmcat-app-interaction
>>     terminate existing, three new:
>>     CC-App interations -> W3C (Varun)
>>     CC-Codec interactions -> RMCAT (Mo)
>>     RMCAT framework
>> Mike Ramallo: Procedural question: this is a WG document,
>> will all three become WG drafts?
>> Karen/Mirja: yes
>
>
> I thought we would submit 3 new individual drafts and seek adoption of
> each separately, adding new milestones for each once adopted. Or will all
> 3 really inherit WG document status, and immediately add 3 new milestones
> to replace the existing one?
>

My recollection was that the 2 documents would start as individual and
when adopted would fulfill the single milestone.
I thought we were undecided on the topic of the RMCAT Framework draft.


> Thanks,
> Mo
>
>
> On 3/31/15, 6:28 PM, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> find the minutes from the last meeting in etherpad:
>
> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-92-rmcat
>
> Thanks to Brian for this great job as minute taker!!!
>
> As we¹ve been running a little bit over time, there might be some few
> comments missing at the end but I pretty everything important got captured
> before that.
>
> If you¹ve spoken in the meeting, please review the minutes and potentially
> apply changes!
>
> I will upload the minutes next week.
>
> Mirja
>



-- 
http://www.callstats.io

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email