Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
RoHC Team <rohc_team@dialine.fr> Wed, 11 April 2012 10:49 UTC
Return-Path: <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76CF21F862B for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQXJAwzOfFLK for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97321F8629 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [88.185.172.218]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17453822E4; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F85618F.8060408@dialine.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:47 +0200
From: RoHC Team <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kristofer Sandlund <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com>
References: <20120411091703.C75D76218A@rfc-editor.org> <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120411-0, 11/04/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>, "rohc_team@dialine.fr" <rohc_team@dialine.fr>, "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com" <ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com>, "martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rohc_team@dialine.fr
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:49:03 -0000
Hi Christopher, Thank you for your quick reply. Best regards, FWX. Le 11/04/2012 11:57, Kristofer Sandlund a écrit : > Hi, > > I agree with this errata. That's an evil typo that I must have made > in the draft that went undetected through the reviews. > I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission > to edit that one. > > /Kristofer > > at den 11 april 2012 11:17, RFC Errata System wrote : >> The following errata report has been submitted for >> RFC5225, "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): >> Profiles for >> RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3185 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: FWX<rohc_team@dialine.fr> >> >> Section: page 64 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value, >> reorder_ratio_value) { UNCOMPRESSED { >> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) || >> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107)); rtp_version =:= >> uncompressed_value(2, 0) [ 2 ]; >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value, >> reorder_ratio_value) { UNCOMPRESSED { >> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) || >> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107)); rtp_version =:= >> uncompressed_value(2, 2) [ 2 ]; >> >> Notes >> ----- >> rtp_version is set to 2, not to zero. See RTP Header >> Fields >> page 115 : Version This field is expected to have >> the >> value two and the field is therefore classified as >> STATIC-KNOWN. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If >> necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it >> should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if >> necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : RObust Header Compression Version 2 >> (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite >> Publication Date : April 2008 >> Author(s) : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Robust Header Compression >> Area : Transport >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >
- [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185) RFC Errata System
- Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3… Kristofer Sandlund
- Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3… RoHC Team
- Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3… Carsten Bormann
- [rohc] RoHCv2 ipv4_innermost_irregular question Klaus Warnke