Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)

RoHC Team <rohc_team@dialine.fr> Wed, 11 April 2012 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76CF21F862B for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQXJAwzOfFLK for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97321F8629 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [88.185.172.218]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17453822E4; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F85618F.8060408@dialine.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:47 +0200
From: RoHC Team <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kristofer Sandlund <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com>
References: <20120411091703.C75D76218A@rfc-editor.org> <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120411-0, 11/04/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>, "rohc_team@dialine.fr" <rohc_team@dialine.fr>, "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com" <ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com>, "martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rohc_team@dialine.fr
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:49:03 -0000

  Hi Christopher,

  Thank you for your quick reply.
  Best regards,

               FWX.

Le 11/04/2012 11:57, Kristofer Sandlund a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I agree with this errata. That's an evil typo that I must have made
> in the draft that went undetected through the reviews.
> I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission
> to edit that one.
>
> /Kristofer
>
> at den 11 april 2012 11:17, RFC Errata System wrote :
>> The following errata report has been submitted for
>> RFC5225, "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2):
>> Profiles for
>> RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3185
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: FWX<rohc_team@dialine.fr>
>>
>> Section: page 64
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
>> reorder_ratio_value) {   UNCOMPRESSED {
>> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
>> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107));     rtp_version =:=
>> uncompressed_value(2, 0) [  2 ];
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
>> reorder_ratio_value) {   UNCOMPRESSED {
>> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
>> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107));     rtp_version =:=
>> uncompressed_value(2, 2) [  2 ];
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> rtp_version is set to 2, not to zero.  See RTP Header
>> Fields
>> page 115 :  Version        This field is expected to have
>> the
>> value two and the field is       therefore classified as
>> STATIC-KNOWN.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If
>> necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it
>> should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if
>> necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : RObust Header Compression Version 2
>> (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
>> Publication Date    : April 2008
>> Author(s)           : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Robust Header Compression
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>