Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)

Kristofer Sandlund <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA1621F850D for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huBSZCg0GgHD for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE4021F850C for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7b07ae000006839-09-4f855589c482
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 69.9D.26681.985558F4; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.2]) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.90]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:57:28 +0200
From: Kristofer Sandlund <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com" <ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com>, "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "carl.knutsson@effnet.com" <carl.knutsson@effnet.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:57:27 +0200
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
Thread-Index: Ac0Xw/FmJE4mQuNySDGqLyd3VoqyuAABQB2A
Message-ID: <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <20120411091703.C75D76218A@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120411091703.C75D76218A@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>, "rohc_team@dialine.fr" <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:57:31 -0000

Hi,

I agree with this errata. That's an evil typo that I must have made
in the draft that went undetected through the reviews. 
I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission
to edit that one.

/Kristofer

at den 11 april 2012 11:17, RFC Errata System wrote :
> The following errata report has been submitted for
> RFC5225, "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2):
> Profiles for 
> RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3185
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: FWX <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
> 
> Section: page 64
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
> reorder_ratio_value) {   UNCOMPRESSED {
> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107));     rtp_version =:=
> uncompressed_value(2, 0) [  2 ];
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
> reorder_ratio_value) {   UNCOMPRESSED {
> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107));     rtp_version =:=
> uncompressed_value(2, 2) [  2 ];
> 
> Notes
> -----
> rtp_version is set to 2, not to zero.  See RTP Header
> Fields 
> page 115 :  Version        This field is expected to have
> the 
> value two and the field is       therefore classified as
> STATIC-KNOWN. 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If
> necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it
> should be verified or 
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> (IESG) 
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if
> necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RObust Header Compression Version 2
> (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
> Publication Date    : April 2008
> Author(s)           : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Robust Header Compression
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG