IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [6lowpan] draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-03.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 15 June 2012 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AE621F845F; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.615, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxxLy26f+Toy; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4E621F86CB; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8C78549; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:09:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 94F7C98C2E; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:12:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E46198C2D; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:12:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E20BD63-02D7-4275-A3C1-2E070D9BB90E@thomasclausen.org>
References: <CBFFC509.17034%d.sturek@att.net> <2E20BD63-02D7-4275-A3C1-2E070D9BB90E@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:12:13 -0400
Message-ID: <16656.1339765933@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "<roll@ietf.org>" <roll@ietf.org>, "<6lowpan@ietf.org>" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lowpan] draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-03.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:12:19 -0000

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> writes:
    Thomas> Not sure how fantastic (or not) it is - it is not
    Thomas> immediately clear to me how tied MLE should be to RPL - if
    Thomas> it truly aims at being for _MESH_ link establishment, then
    Thomas> it would appear to be a much larger scope, and should not be
    Thomas> tied narrowly to a special-purpose protocol's type-space (&
    Thomas> conventions etc., that do not apply universally). 

Thomas, you will note that:
  1) I suggested it go under IPv6 ICMP first, and if there was such push
     back about allocating a new type, that RPL could allocate a type/code.
  2) ZigBee alliance (the proposal), *IS* using RPL.

I see running it over UDP very architecturally strange.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email