Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41.txt
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 20:46 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AA83A09A8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4xhLd7k-Yt5 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16303A003F for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id gr14so19761586ejb.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JTQTaZTQ32cpM5ScdRGKvzHKyJznahoySl4NHBZs6S0=; b=Rl/EjPHQHWOtUscl12ijj8bOzI/wPU8L1XgYUkPdbAaums9v9/G4K6g8NomGl9Ahxg OsUsZt674S/c+5CdGyFXp2lt+Q5E4tctK8gQpyTOKAp6KPg9lsBFyZ3sHGOknlxRZAP3 7QFaCBshhJMZnGfuJMgbkanMZ2tQ1dJYq6HVC6jdcRDRRUOBGdMFLmemkXqpI38RbWF/ udRGtWT96immdQB6DSoLoQ1/rgPSxJDOhrrMI9lG+mLv/Qawli8AYPKjk/HdolJkVzII Rdd77CfgpuHgjfI7H1VJConHN4nu+offeq6yoU9DLY3wNfn8dUKoL1JOfb6K/fXGmKto 1pNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JTQTaZTQ32cpM5ScdRGKvzHKyJznahoySl4NHBZs6S0=; b=DGoEKscqrzugJF8y6L92FeEnwod1EpmK/QkcPJM2W6TSVyHHXomuNj7IcmIPDkrl88 dxMuug2JHbiYgcJVasiZYTLSzDx1HJd5eR1FEL1TszvNqax5nZmhEr7jNXj1v3r7/N1k JCe8/8lxHv0gLi7HDgoiGTm9Kxq4bz9rRLyql7sgc3miwPzdvcf7DD25ZV2Ix36+Y0rf rIzEBqEjg7PACOkpd4goD63h8xsib45BVLbIpDamRCKZ8m1PykyxlODiSTYaoNHhtSlH qC5A91jzVztkfnTL9GgIZkRAarCMghQ3vUNPpeU/3FdvW1teGom2ZLkWdueONc7HwRcS kJGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TT2EXhOdcGdyD4VLB33pe9Ad6dhb9lXZpMPFLrY9kZgNORkDs FdQ69AqmXBC6LvWJqH76qeH6FJ+3sw1Uw99lSCHYOXlO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVtg4yc/MKL58uo6SHFCK3XcyZ0mrA//PjhS0xlUJ8+fBj1lJuQKmrixVrqxtp2yca+1cCpZ6jESiJhOOxHj0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c0c4:: with SMTP id bn4mr1334802ejb.27.1600721189264; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:28 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <195789.1600714786@dooku>
References: <160071395471.20401.6949662287254386726@ietfa.amsl.com> <195789.1600714786@dooku>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:46:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESszM7vbqsXcvB9vWTM6GdaeFa+=M6oQTkzoJRWbSSL4-fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/1aiUP2LBslIRLZU018keoEcDMCM>
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:46:32 -0000
On September 21, 2020 at 3:00:00 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41 Michael: At first glance the diffs look good to me too. But I have a question: §4.3 now reads: "For a MOP value of 7, a node SHOULD assume that the RPI 0x23 option is enabled." When is it ok for a node to assume that the RPI 0x23 option is not enabled? IOW, why is the behavior recommended but not required? It seems to me that the behavior may not be consistent. Also, please reword so that the normative action is not to "assume"; maybe something like "use 0x23"... Thanks! Alvaro.
- [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-4… internet-drafts
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… dominique.barthel
- Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-useofrplin… Ines Robles