Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL

+1 on the draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection

Allowing a centralized entity to install p2p routes between end-nodes is an interesting feature that can be very useful in real-time or very constrained networks among others. This could, among others, allow for a much richer path calculation in the PCE, otherwise be unfeasible by the end-nodes.

Best,
Alexander

> Le 31 août 2016 à 09:50, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Yes, I support as well,
> 
> Thanks
> 
> AB
> 
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw) <pwetterw@cisco.com <mailto:pwetterw@cisco.com>> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I support the work on DAO projection and would be willing to review it.
> 
> This will bring value to a RPL based network.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/08/16 08:49, "Roll on behalf of peter van der Stok" <roll-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of stokcons@xs4all.nl <mailto:stokcons@xs4all.nl>> wrote:
> 
> >Dear all,
> >
> >Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
> >opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the
> >last set of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will
> >be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.
> >
> >Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
> >
> >
> >  F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
> >      Root initiated routing state in RPL
> >
> >•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> >•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> >•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> >•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> >
> >
> >  G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
> >        Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
> >
> >  •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> >  •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> >  •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> >  •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> >
> >
> >It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the
> >drafts
> >
> >
> >Thank you very much,
> >
> >
> >  Peter and Ines
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Roll mailing list
> >Roll@ietf.org <mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org <mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"