IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Fri, 12 August 2016 06:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD2312D98D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPYsBSKIIz32 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D438E12D987 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.203]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id W6ph1t0064NtgTm016phu5; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:49:42 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:f1da:b7ce:d0ab:664 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:49:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:49:41 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <7aff23749031ebe9e839e0aa9ac3c1db@xs4all.nl>
References: <5ac3960df196482c01fc272d9164012a@xs4all.nl> <5795E3B9.4000802@ericsson.com> <50d0bcdd18ff300aaf1e183f6751c492@xs4all.nl> <5795F37C.1050303@ericsson.com> <7aff23749031ebe9e839e0aa9ac3c1db@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <9b78090fa7c3a958fac60b5759659220@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (yTSeeGyPPresPXRuwpV8cFpsc+KtKIM7)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/KhWQvgcqiA5vnwzeoEJnsnRrwd8>
Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 06:49:46 -0000

Dear all,

Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the
last set of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will
be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.

Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.


  F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
      Root initiated routing state in RPL

•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?


  G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
        Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)

  •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
  •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
  •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
  •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?


It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the 
drafts


Thank you very much,


  Peter and Ines

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email