IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 24 August 2016 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC9B12D104 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.07
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.07 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvObsePfM2sm for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3430012D0ED for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2882; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472055129; x=1473264729; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=H3KuCcj98k1reuiFW5AdHZ+Ig7YACncwEUNdnu4cPdI=; b=hfZjlPcld2Fh/9W+KSmgVRzWkq7AsgjKXU1YztEmoHb3xYGhiywjBGH9 lna3uv6tbEgIIO474hAYVy2IUb44S3wZ7bHS0dfrF4bvT+kac+t0MKM0x 9FcP+2q4346RxEVlzH5mkNlMHENVZrHq9dzzUxudE8SLtiWac091zvQNd 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AtAgCsxr1X/5RdJa1dgykBAQEBAR5WfAe4CIF+JIV5AhyBLDgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEFAQEhEToXBAIBCBEEAQEDAiMDAgICJQsUAQgIAgQTCIgqDq5MkAYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEChSuETYQmgxyCWgWIN4cfiXIBjxqBdIRciQdIi3iDeAEeNoFpX4E1cIdBfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,571,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="144908201"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2016 16:12:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7OGC8IF006762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:12:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:12:07 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:12:07 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"
Thread-Index: AQHR9GW6pQZbcyc640ukbVgCa3jCzKBYQ0DQ
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:12:06 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:11:52 +0000
Message-ID: <0397cc238588472e9c6e9299a7840e08@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <5ac3960df196482c01fc272d9164012a@xs4all.nl> <5795E3B9.4000802@ericsson.com> <50d0bcdd18ff300aaf1e183f6751c492@xs4all.nl> <5795F37C.1050303@ericsson.com> <7aff23749031ebe9e839e0aa9ac3c1db@xs4all.nl> <9b78090fa7c3a958fac60b5759659220@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <9b78090fa7c3a958fac60b5759659220@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.216.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/uAbwOc1DrJGBbTK9V6jkzb6BOq4>
Subject: Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:12:11 -0000

I support both, Peter.

* We have studied reactive (like AODV) in the past and we know we need it for particular P2P flows, say this sensor and this actuator need a circuit (e.g. a 6TiSCH track) with particular characteristics. 
* As of DAO projection I support it as an author. Once we have reactive and proactive distributed routing, a hint of centralized routing seems the way to go for more deterministic / TE type of sensor communication. 

Cheers,

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok
> Sent: vendredi 12 août 2016 08:50
> To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - >
> DAO_Projection"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your opinion
> about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the last set of three
> messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will be asked independently
> dependent on the status of the draft.
> 
> Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
> 
> 
>   F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
>       Root initiated routing state in RPL
> 
> •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> 
>   G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
>         Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
> 
>   •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>   •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
>   •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>   •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> 
> It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the drafts
> 
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> 
>   Peter and Ines
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email