Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Yusuke DOI <[e-mail]>]

Hi Brian,

Thank you very much for your review!

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
(snip)
> 2. In section 2.3 (MPL Forwarder Behavior), there should be a brief
> discussion of the role of the MPL Domain Address and include a reference
> to [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
(snip)

Does the following text added on Section 2.3 looks good for you?


"""
If a DHCPv6 client requests and receives the MPL Parameter
Configuration Option, the node SHOULD join the MPL domain given by
the option and act as an MPL forwarder.  Note that there may be cases
in which a node may fail to join a domain (or domains) due to local
resource constraints.  Each joining node SHOULD configure its MPL
forwarder with the given parameter set for the MPL domain.
<added>
Each MPL domain is defined by an MPL Domain Address given by an MPL
Parameter Configuration Option. As defined in Section 2 of
[I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast], an MPL Domain Address is an IPv6
multicast address associated to a set of MPL network interfaces
in an MPL Domain.
</added>
"""

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> - Why is the text in Appendix A not in the Operational Considerations
> section?

It's my another mistake. I'll move it on next revision (already merged as operational consideration on my local repo)

Best Regards,

// Yusuke DOI <[e-mail]>

On 2015-09-09 23:39, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-07: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Updated for -07...
>
> 1. Resolved
>
> 2. In section 2.3 (MPL Forwarder Behavior), there should be a brief
> discussion of the role of the MPL Domain Address and include a reference
> to [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
>
> 3. Resolved
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> - Why is the text in Appendix A not in the Operational Considerations
> section?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>