Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

These changes look good.

Regards,
Brian


On 9/30/15 1:27 AM, Yusuke DOI wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Thank you very much for your review!
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (snip)
>> 2. In section 2.3 (MPL Forwarder Behavior), there should be a brief
>> discussion of the role of the MPL Domain Address and include a reference
>> to [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
> (snip)
> 
> Does the following text added on Section 2.3 looks good for you?
> 
> 
> """
> If a DHCPv6 client requests and receives the MPL Parameter
> Configuration Option, the node SHOULD join the MPL domain given by
> the option and act as an MPL forwarder.  Note that there may be cases
> in which a node may fail to join a domain (or domains) due to local
> resource constraints.  Each joining node SHOULD configure its MPL
> forwarder with the given parameter set for the MPL domain.
> <added>
> Each MPL domain is defined by an MPL Domain Address given by an MPL
> Parameter Configuration Option. As defined in Section 2 of
> [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast], an MPL Domain Address is an IPv6
> multicast address associated to a set of MPL network interfaces
> in an MPL Domain.
> </added>
> """
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - Why is the text in Appendix A not in the Operational Considerations
>> section?
> 
> It's my another mistake. I'll move it on next revision (already merged
> as operational consideration on my local repo)
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> // Yusuke DOI <[e-mail]>
> 
> On 2015-09-09 23:39, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-07: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Updated for -07...
>>
>> 1. Resolved
>>
>> 2. In section 2.3 (MPL Forwarder Behavior), there should be a brief
>> discussion of the role of the MPL Domain Address and include a reference
>> to [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
>>
>> 3. Resolved
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - Why is the text in Appendix A not in the Operational Considerations
>> section?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>