Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 20 May 2015 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE671B2D61; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2z2uMwhyTdv; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4143E1B2DBE; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39256BEDC; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:49:28 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGuEYXEMDQQ3; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:49:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [192.168.48.65] (unknown [119.145.14.6]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3041DBED9; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:49:22 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <555C043A.50904@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 04:49:14 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
References: <20150408233408.4123.3118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <fb86c816367f2cef72685d1cbaf23e2a@xs4all.nl> <14934.1429043465@sandelman.ca> <0b35569a80c62337655b16c7010a84da@xs4all.nl> <12442.1429113740@sandelman.ca> <32c66dc3bb9f396188b90a178ff767d9@xs4all.nl> <15944.1429209784@sandelman.ca> <4b7fa589766fa21d12403ee8cc49262e@xs4all.nl> <55586FF8.5060908@cs.tcd.ie> <d065c9d28a735b2687c94698c655cf28@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <d065c9d28a735b2687c94698c655cf28@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Ao3FV6B5dty2DKZQXdbQ-sIpAqo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 May 2015 16:55:13 -0700
Cc: mcr@sandelman.ca, roll-chairs@ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building@ietf.org, yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 03:49:34 -0000

Thanks Peter,

On 19/05/15 11:27, peter van der Stok wrote:
>
> If my responses above add to the confusion, I think that a telconf 
> will help.
Well I do confess to continuing confusion (not caused by you
though) about how we get secure interop,in general here so
maybe we ought think about it.
> However, I should very much like that Robert Cragie and/or Michael 
> Richardson assist as well.
> Their experience will clearly contribute to arrive at a satisfying 
> conclusion.
Good idea to do that first, yes.

Cheers,
S