IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] Adoption draft-goyal-roll-p2p-measurement-01 as a ROLL WG document

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Fri, 01 April 2011 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDE73A6BE9 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ls4oxVlZPCPL for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEA73A6A28 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=295; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301633806; x=1302843406; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: to:mime-version; bh=ssH7BHTG4kqrRsQkY/0KQfe/6EXQbGcQ0nw7M3vIDXg=; b=gjn8/yOeA0E79I2XITkEN5NsvAB7BmPxgT+B7pdEUsJJBjFVVcMJl8XG x0ATwzjRsWZpR7Vb6DWnR80xO62j9uxyJz/5t3329uLhXJrhwi3Ew4+jX XFC54tzv5uTMSEGF3zISaUoCgVr+GKc5qdQ8mFUXEiqYIFdz1ptThUCyp Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsDAEBalU2Q/khNgWdsb2JhbAClWhQBARYmJaNenC2FawSNFoNe
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,280,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="81750102"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2011 04:56:44 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p314ujs4025884 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:56:45 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-201.cisco.com ([144.254.231.95]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:56:44 +0200
Received: from dhcp-4074.meeting.ietf.org ([10.55.91.83]) by xfe-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:56:44 +0200
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:56:43 +0200
Message-Id: <43AEA790-8199-4A86-A318-4963713CD991@cisco.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2011 04:56:44.0643 (UTC) FILETIME=[32C72B30:01CBF029]
Subject: [Roll] Adoption draft-goyal-roll-p2p-measurement-01 as a ROLL WG document
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:55:08 -0000

Dear all,

draft-goyal-roll-p2p-measurement has been discussed on the mailing list and is a normative
reference of the P2P document.

Could you tell us if you are in favor/opposed to adopt draft-goyal-roll-p2p-measurement-01 as 
a ROLL Working Group document ?

Thanks.

JP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email