IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] DAO-Projection and new MOPs

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 04:44 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192011276D0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:44:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOZ2-ITZ-hx3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437F012D84D for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 40so17971606oth.4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=i05GlbSAp5A7ZbUfzKnwlIHqnjcThp6GDP02BMrH7rE=; b=TGWaKBQ/VUSUYfyV8ObAKj9gK5z2GgNim0urNEdvUfmysyPK6BoP8A5Jhnmo7/mtqJ 5zwcvx5iDnb1pT8eaZjc41ux4U5Ug6w0C7VHMGWScHsEa5GMkZOPQjWIQpfPvH2kceXD CFTgnF6teqhJmxXoLlWJ5l1fxSEjYUC/9pWpIJoD5TQyEWO6CaHEILtAaXUVpvspwmfb GF9vcguFSAqtru1QSaqzbEONx6+uCuFun0OQaRyErjG5o2/2CEbDFuEaI8Tmkih82onH MJN8TqcGsdfcIfE8OP/tJKGwvXouid3ajsx2TKYyoN93GFFvocyMwarC4XtWQ/AAdw1E dAEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=i05GlbSAp5A7ZbUfzKnwlIHqnjcThp6GDP02BMrH7rE=; b=JDUYwXox/GvTfsEwaffQJD/kqkGVz4A2b+2X0s7h35VqUOqyLVPRUeBFbphRjQU89a oeJmxtRCfxmsmusYk2E1u2uYY1d4CthJKlrrPES+rmIt60+FtMZEAsAzrKt/eJrS1sc6 aWNzCAYqvkmSneEAS6ZkN2hDLmBImRW+cdF2ZQNSYuMsf8A7FWy6ar+VviddjnUeYTpC 5liRI80oIcHqxCZ8iBSBubKNXizJQwIjrN4ENR0rzogUntdKK2mx0ah5nc19+MN9JLm7 NzNE02yT0gKzvAmT8hG05UC6ba6cRh9xfxQh/0kHM7rt+16bTwRIVMaREjWcVnS2l5Ov IO6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaMfQ0YtdZe9GYUvF1/rPzgaZKklD8KIptoDEn63xN3XjNvchlM 3EjJZ7bCmZOgo88XUHY8ZXJnyTuzBePRHaf1DVzELFQ0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WwNVmCqA9kiFbXDVu0PVIWPysjMneIRpzTX4RE+ovXy6f1ZnePmDue8g93i7nwVq8tV02HdfFsYbpVTzXwr5s=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7b42:: with SMTP id f2mr12822180oto.184.1545194688498; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:44:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO0Djp0wiHUg15SfLzqXRF6Ko9JBbeL7C9CLZ6HRXcNxf+=Gew@mail.gmail.com> <0cb3313f79eb475090937a932b793efc@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <16712.1545069107@localhost> <6811D20F-DC62-4E16-86EE-684BD288E2CF@cisco.com> <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DD4D8E0@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <a472122b1597405c9d8519c6b4737baf@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <a472122b1597405c9d8519c6b4737baf@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:44:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88x5VN3dtbAVJ24JMbzrVsOpZpoio6CyLjruSxuWg6J2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084513f057d58aca1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/CAASS7LTXmgzLpUp73OY-9ixtDs>
Subject: Re: [Roll] DAO-Projection and new MOPs
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:44:53 -0000

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:42 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> All for it. What do others think?
>

I think I posted a message before months about this MOP problem but no
reply from the list, but now seems there started a discussion, but yes the
MOP should be more than 3 bit. I suggest modifying that RFC that specifies
3 bits, I don't support extending but changing.


>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rahul Arvind Jadhav
> > Sent: mardi 18 décembre 2018 04:52
> > To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Roll] DAO-Projection and new MOPs
> >
> > I'm wondering apart from MOP extension, it would be nice to have
> capability
> > flags in DIO.
> > 1. Capabilities field can work with ext-MOP to handshake additional
> > capabilities ..
> > 2. Even leaf nodes can understand capabilities ... unlike MOP which is
> relevant
> > only to routers.
> > Capabilities may be optional to support unlike MOP which is mandatory to
> be
> > supported if the node is to be a 6LR in the instance.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert
> > > (pthubert)
> > > Sent: 18 December 2018 01:27
> > > To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [Roll] DAO-Projection and new MOPs
> > >
> > > I agree Michael
> > >
> > > Trouble is that there is no room left in MOP space (3 bits). We’ll
> > > soon need to define a value to mean extended.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Pascal
> > >
> > > > Le 17 déc. 2018 à 18:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> > > > a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I strongly believe that we should have a specific new MOP:
> > > >  "Non-storing with DAO-project"
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software
> > > Works
> > > > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Roll mailing list
> > > > Roll@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Roll mailing list
> > > Roll@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> > _______________________________________________
> > Roll mailing list
> > Roll@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email