IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] cabilities in DIO messages

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 18 December 2018 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041E5130F39 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:35:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8J6NFXos1g2 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D6B130F25 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACF72008C for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:35:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id BDC38B5D; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:35:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3962BA for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:35:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DD4D8E0@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAO0Djp0wiHUg15SfLzqXRF6Ko9JBbeL7C9CLZ6HRXcNxf+=Gew@mail.gmail.com> <0cb3313f79eb475090937a932b793efc@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>, <16712.1545069107@localhost> <6811D20F-DC62-4E16-86EE-684BD288E2CF@cisco.com> <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DD4D8E0@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:35:53 -0500
Message-ID: <32467.1545150953@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/aS3GOIL3EHInaJthrF4nE1uSRic>
Subject: [Roll] cabilities in DIO messages
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:35:57 -0000

Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com> wrote:
    > I'm wondering apart from MOP extension, it would be nice to have
    > capability flags in DIO.
    > 1. Capabilities field can work with ext-MOP to handshake additional
    > capabilities ..
    > 2. Even leaf nodes can 
    > understand capabilities ...

I think we should continue this conversation.
Are they negotiated, or simply declared? ("I can do X")

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email