[Roll] Looking for Linux implementation of RPL for interop testing

"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FD61A1A67 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wvv3dllSZ81 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF0F1AC409 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=279; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427899710; x=1429109310; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OJFa2yHfmFWtIxKxaE1zqDCHSTUUtmY9Y2MqomVEYGU=; b=EK70s8F4QebxYVqaRgjs5O1XSBprRBtAMKcGc9ehEPuI+N6zdE9oxdha wsE3LQAaJ5DC7xE+LEUg9ke+FYxgKgbg+c2jbUJ56C99S55M10mmu45W0 QgGtQS6bpo+Li1zWITYlFeDpi2oefYCe9sQNpXwgKC3edaT9XAf1N/W4C c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFBQAYBRxV/4ENJK1cgwaBM80JTAEBAQEBAX2EGzpRAT5CJwSIQqV7qHsBAQEBBgEBAQEBAQEbkz+BFgWQY4l2lD4ig26CM38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,504,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="557635"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2015 14:48:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t31Em9Tu010159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:48:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.86]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:48:09 -0500
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Looking for Linux implementation of RPL for interop testing
Thread-Index: AQHQbIre4/FtDPIGg0SXIQND1/xNyw==
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <DC67D807-BCFD-4447-A58E-D6D1E30F2DE7@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.245.44]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C4D5B140F16D3641A205D3F0BC58FF47@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Et_1gcFtjM09KcjroM2jN2Hw0aw>
Subject: [Roll] Looking for Linux implementation of RPL for interop testing
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:48:31 -0000

Can anyone point me at an implementation of RPL for Linux that provides non-storing mode operation?  I'm looking for both an LBR/DODAG root implementation and an LR implementation.  THe purpose is interoperability testing with an independent implementation.

- Ralph