Re: [Roll] Revision of Security Threat Analysis Draft

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0DC21F9521 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xH+lm6obZI0j for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EBF21F94ED for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id xa12so1745582pbc.8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=18vBwqg6HFeVtdS3cW3/iBEN6YmBg402QF2g9zMmMa4=; b=wfPIfR9JVoYefqlXu/cthmJt1S91/9tQTBdJSSLpPagzlWxYpaOSPdn2nntsngJ1no DVjaV22na7nnzQY+u8PZ0joJSHzXmJMDes8XBVmlm2lyq1JHBBNDXQwCfMqjt6vdDd6r X/hNT3/dXVnzfhayoKkdlasXZvcjR1EJK7g2kskodC9RTfjZSRn0AUvMnbeP0qI9yh0M YBaQOsYSQJUboNqH82s6ZxuIBrsQuBnKHPuojioquDQRDABnkg4GyZ0fqdQEdllLUScA Jz6jlr4H9c8ISm7malElSr9no+kaqJLF+P0T/5Sbj+XU2u4HlumhZvw2cRUklGXt5xKZ 1RIA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.245.229 with SMTP id xr5mr18843805pbc.163.1361810737980; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.33.132 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:45:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836024C0B9A@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
References: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836024C0B9A@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:45:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88EKEjGb+SAN0wtCggBG_Jub_nSXNqzqU15vf2L_6nb=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e155d49e52d04d68f4567"
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Revision of Security Threat Analysis Draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:45:38 -0000

do you mean draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01.txt, please point to the
name of the draft, sorry I am getting carzy,

AB

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Tsao, Tzeta <
Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> wrote:

> WG,****
>
> ** **
>
> We have uploaded a revision in response to comments from the Routing Area
> Directorate and Gen-ART. Comments from the Security Directorate and
> Operations Directorate, as a whole, may have implications of requiring
> changes in the draft's structure, and are yet to be addressed. One proposal
> is to remove Section 6. We will keep working on the unresolved issues and
> welcome any input.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Tzeta****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>