IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Revision of Security Threat Analysis Draft

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514A21F9546 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uG1mPr876Ml6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C86121F94D1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fa11so1854104pad.37 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+0PWQW5kAMD+gaByvCDp5v+R1U3F7vOGKnnguK5Vd3Y=; b=DsU4CQRhiGxdW4N90fY+EYDVmvzxubygoWPumNvY0LcUTdCFFR+Pd2bXRtXs12a5tn dAvT6ccvucEg/CqvEMRfc8Du5DW08VNEmSJkrAFH2Au9SP0sQwAZ50Xn/dGZt1KqZ1Rp twmCVUx/AS7Yo9Aem49ygbc8j0Bf7f3TvXf6VmnPky4o0xiieYevUk3zc/34gq/1WtGH 5qIBr3axVqR3zoMr4gG02V6kPi9Q6z1v2PhSU2TaMGVuF3CsNmTgWd6DSLvGCj1RrNk6 vUuJdw/3RDaRizqHDx0C7fAg/Nq0GtQzKP6JQDpTDGqUwBG+yTf9BOtd7/MsS5lUHuHE QqLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.245.229 with SMTP id xr5mr18909105pbc.163.1361811541003; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.33.132 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:59:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836024C0BBD@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
References: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836024C0B9A@EVS2.nam.ci.root> <CADnDZ88EKEjGb+SAN0wtCggBG_Jub_nSXNqzqU15vf2L_6nb=Q@mail.gmail.com> <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836024C0BBD@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89sf+nAUonyZ2ws2VxRULgVDEbTqA_eTMsOxCqumq81wA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e155d270ba104d68f7545"
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Revision of Security Threat Analysis Draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:59:02 -0000

Hi Tzeta,

I don't know what were the comments of such reviews, so I cannot know where
the work is going, it is not reasonable to change the structure as long as
the WG has agreed on it, however, I agree to delete section 6

AB

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Tsao, Tzeta <
Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> wrote:

> Yes.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01.txt
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Tzeta****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Abdussalam Baryun [mailto:abdussalambaryun@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2013 11:46 AM
> *To:* Tsao, Tzeta
> *Cc:* roll@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] Revision of Security Threat Analysis Draft****
>
> ** **
>
> do you mean draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01.txt, please point to the
> name of the draft, sorry I am getting carzy,****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> AB****
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Tsao, Tzeta <
> Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> wrote:****
>
> WG,****
>
>  ****
>
> We have uploaded a revision in response to comments from the Routing Area
> Directorate and Gen-ART. Comments from the Security Directorate and
> Operations Directorate, as a whole, may have implications of requiring
> changes in the draft's structure, and are yet to be addressed. One proposal
> is to remove Section 6. We will keep working on the unresolved issues and
> welcome any input.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Tzeta****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll****
>
> ** **
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email