[Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations-00.txt

"Shitanshu Shah (svshah)" <svshah@cisco.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <svshah@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9454F21F953B; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:55:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlYW-b47-IMU; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9552321F9525; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:55:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2389; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1361811358; x=1363020958; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ei6PXThpTNhDEpztQ47tLTW31+HvckfjvaaxdonEM+U=; b=Ky9J3VyH4M1jeBID8WtJvIsFLhvwnXan6s0Km7U5Z2sE7LstCYw7a/// LOUTImcauE30Tk1DY9+0CcN/GpqOcPVzSMS0FOoPDIZtNzNQy4b7ZMzIp ssRrb9CsMuzUEcNIHz4f1V3TAK4jEeRUt6HLQ+EnlF0CB4zD0rnjM5+Sk 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAHaWK1GtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFwVWBBRZzgh8BAQEEOj0UAQgSEBRCFwQBBgMCBAESCAGICgy/L41OgQ84gl9hA5JChRiPSIFSgTWCJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,735,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="180895511"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2013 16:55:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1PGtw00003717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:55:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.5.82]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:55:57 -0600
From: "Shitanshu Shah (svshah)" <svshah@cisco.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOE3j7e3DE7qiuzkW77qu/KD41hw==
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:55:57 +0000
Message-ID: <F5C7FB9548FA6A4B8538AFEF6199B0ED151C927F@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130218052624.23876.72337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.1.130117
x-originating-ip: [10.21.70.77]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BE071BF120C5E5468209465475B46683@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:55:59 -0000

Hi,

Below is a revised version under re-named I-D, as was suggested by tsvwg
chairs to have tsvwg in the draft name.

Previous revision: 
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-svshah-lln-diffserv-recommendations-01.txt

One of the discussion points in the last meeting, at Atlanta, was if to
retain one of the existing code-point for Deterministic service class or
define explicit one.
Current revision, retains use of EF code-point for this service,
anticipating mutually exclusive presence of Voice vs Deterministic class
of traffic.

However, PHB definition for this LLN class of traffic is more than just
low latency (a definition used in classic networks). This has been
highlighted in the draft.

Any comments much appreciated..

Regards,
Shitanshu



On 2/17/13 9:26 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
wrote:

>
>A new version of I-D,
>draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations-00.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Shitanshu Shah and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Filename:	 draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations
>Revision:	 00
>Title:		 Differentiated Service Class Recommendations for LLN Traffic
>Creation date:	 2013-02-18
>Group:		 Individual Submission
>Number of pages: 15
>URL:             
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recomm
>endations-00.txt
>Status:          
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommenda
>tions
>Htmlized:        
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-svshah-tsvwg-lln-diffserv-recommendations
>-00
>
>
>Abstract:
>   Differentiated services architecture is widely deployed in
>   traditional networks.  There exist well defined recommendations for
>   the use of appropriate differentiated service classes for different
>   types of traffic (eg. audio, video) in these networks.  Per-Hop
>   Behaviors are typically defined based on this recommendations.  With
>   emerging Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs), it is important to have
>   similar defined differentiated services recommendations for LLN
>   traffic.  Defined recommendations are for LLN class of traffic
>   exiting out of LLNs towards high-speed backbones, converged campus
>   network and for the traffic in the reverse direction.
>
>                  
>        
>
>
>The IETF Secretariat
>