IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 03 May 2018 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1661270AE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pVEiKCETSbwY for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A698124C27 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1301; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525354664; x=1526564264; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FiHKJCLtHvEI/iQ9ktEyjLYs7G0IrnA4YP09/YDmPRo=; b=D5TVexM02DmfJflXP8rwdShHr9RYFxj1Ji9O0vMS+w66OpE0ivp4P018 cpLsPhZdFDL27ATNVUO/Fdi+SZgDHUZODDnJLdse37mmfrYH6Bzaaz5BD 8fLUeBQCYByc2PuE8kRCUZYEgTegt3D5ZgX/B572/NfT3U4ezjQtNfEpQ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBAQCvD+ta/4YNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYXooCotljG+BPTuBD5MagXgLH4FYgnUCgi4hNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAyFKAEBAQEDOksEAgEIEQQBAQEeEDIdCAIEEwiFB6sUiEeCQogdgVQ/gQ+DC4RXhXACmBoIAo5CjGGQGwIREwGBJAEcOIFScBWCfgmFH4smb49FgRgBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,358,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="108824090"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 May 2018 13:37:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w43DbhO8005237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 13:37:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 3 May 2018 08:37:42 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 3 May 2018 08:37:42 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling
Thread-Index: AQHTwciVQsGzK7ypcECrCDATupfKUqQOrAGAgA7z2gCAAB9OgIAAIbNAgAC1MQD//61tkA==
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 13:37:30 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 3 May 2018 13:36:57 +0000
Message-ID: <685a615a79e8442f9f7b19983ef2a36d@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <8EC2893F-731B-439D-86FE-984505349D8D@tzi.org> <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DBCD1B4@BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <22477.1525301358@localhost> <CAO0Djp1sCSFJSZSbVNL+RLgV2FrjwZQrJ6p-9ExndMbQqua-QA@mail.gmail.com> <0522ea86b4234490bdd56b1428db0762@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <29982.1525354228@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <29982.1525354228@localhost>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.216.15]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/PFCDr9ls38JGdCtGPtorW3BBl_E>
Subject: Re: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 13:37:46 -0000

Hello Michael

There might be a confusion with the DODAG version. DTSN is sourced at each node, individually.

Take care,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: jeudi 3 mai 2018 15:30
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear
> leveling
> 
> 
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>     > Rebooting within the lollipop is really bad luck; the whole point of
>     > the lollipop is to detect intermittent reboots and not force to store
>     > the sequence in flash.
>     > Note that you do not need to start from default 240, you may restart
>     > from, say, 250. Or you may increase the sequence by more than one. All
>     > that to stay less in the straight piece of the lollipop.
> 
> I don't understand why a node can't take the DTSN from it's parent as it's
> base value.
> 
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email