IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 11 May 2018 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E417C12E76A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 00:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZxB2mqWzwkB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 00:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B789F127058 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 00:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=288; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1526022909; x=1527232509; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lG9WdvHghw1vILXvsdrfwN9QSrP7TuHi9TxhyKrSDbQ=; b=XbvuMWpLU4lJIMA3DOAt3xZ/eYrQNPOscA576sNSV1Y/yEKnbyKdITOD I1dsebuxMrp1WiO3+CErqgjXGIZ7A50xLuL8A7ZyZ6//bnbpT6TyLJBgK Uvs/oZFhAcb3irti7mNfTp4pvK0nfHU5JIoCtyhGEqScvA04F6KzHEHA1 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BWAQAXQvVa/4wNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDgVwyi2yMboF5gQ+TNIF4C4RsAoMCITQYAQIBAQEBAQECbCiFKAEBAQMBOkQLAgEINhAyJQIEG4UUCK4jiEiCSIglgVQ/hBqKRwKYLgkCjkeBMAGLPoIrjgcCERMBgSQBHDiBUnAVgn+QTY8PgRgBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,387,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="393537305"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2018 07:15:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4B7F8Do001075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 07:15:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 11 May 2018 02:15:08 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 11 May 2018 02:15:08 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling
Thread-Index: AQHTwciVQsGzK7ypcECrCDATupfKUqQN4y+QgA8MpwCAAB9OgIAAdwaAgABf3gCAAAH3AIAAPNoAgAW+F5CAASfcgIAFYF1Q
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 07:14:41 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 11 May 2018 07:13:49 +0000
Message-ID: <ed56afcc3841466bb670c601b4afd7b4@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <8EC2893F-731B-439D-86FE-984505349D8D@tzi.org> <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DBCD1B4@BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <22477.1525301358@localhost> <CAO0Djp1sCSFJSZSbVNL+RLgV2FrjwZQrJ6p-9ExndMbQqua-QA@mail.gmail.com> <0522ea86b4234490bdd56b1428db0762@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <29982.1525354228@localhost> <685a615a79e8442f9f7b19983ef2a36d@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <25461.1525367718@localhost> <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DBE374F@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <23345.1525709153@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <23345.1525709153@localhost>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.64.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Sid9jby7nWh0saPQ0IOR77gzhak>
Subject: Re: [Roll] draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations-00 Section 2.1: Wear leveling
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 07:15:11 -0000

Hello Michael:
 
> So I think that the errata against 6550 is that it should be a lollipop counter,
> and I think that this solves the reboot problem, and eliminates having to write
> it to flash.
> 
Agreed, it should have been listed in section 7.

Take care,
Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email