[Roll] Review of draft-koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-extension-02

"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Thu, 18 October 2018 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0497F1200D7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e_qo715umEix for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44ED0120072 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id x4so26901135otg.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0sIHgp0wp17+wHCnhrq8e6m4bccmD7CMwxhJ/oRwaww=; b=BEDR0QRcHFgvBlG/+aknYJeeQaQsi6HifFmV+a7ihMibmVLgTtEm67+hFK21vuhdyT TFiodXPUl+PsqriLqSYR4wyJJ9rs2n0YRwoADU93kJ55OfoMXe5a6SROU/7azlSgWRR6 jJ8zMdxE2bPoUays+bU9oikPTaf+vEP0B2yndHkV/VFL993Sc69XBDsIWf8tQe2Rs3q6 R1MkbzskLyTKrSqDputJqcg6XdRvedJsyj7U1xNVHfq6j+qd/76JE+FNaZxZSoxuRjdG K3bs3Sq1wB1TNkra9CFttyyinfHyeoSnQPaw8pUWZaFzUvPqAHDBDIl1S4S4/RwV3bYZ I22w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0sIHgp0wp17+wHCnhrq8e6m4bccmD7CMwxhJ/oRwaww=; b=CXa48Ky6oKdoo23s9+MIVwhX1zlM0p5iWHOVcLfWSY4hi3kbPJ34g717dD6XXitMGm zFtzCn0ZLUrqyjkjv5kLciySFlqOR6cjr/h7sQXO5vlESZo7kRojYSmk0JHi4iZVr7GN m3lwOseh9YolK4Xx9ZyClZ2KZCI5TYVBESYXSL2WG9gwlwSgl5TomUROdCuDBku8LOzF O4sYpz8qzFnlIPgIqBbKwn0CHabx/WAsbZdUbaRL6P+FLx8Uv8x9xt3NoZ+xnhLCgNup KjbaUmPzs2SEn3SyCVVbBPaX0khStUFNQZibbq+acxi9RLhMptFFFcCbYCYp97Fgy776 PnQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogE5yKMBZ7Obt0l12vNeJ6BLHo1zK2491f5gLd/J2xl+2TS1GcX UeK8wen4yXSG1UFAEBG/RKA3Ttk12m6dCOOVB7C0hzXiwTrmZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62rN6FA+Vbl799UGcisj5patOLyaG+oJflcatqCVEdz3U5HWICUL9MJuDrTdzntqO2VC2O/Zjy53PmByn0OdZk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7581:: with SMTP id s1mr19680391otk.39.1539830299778; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 23:38:08 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV8dSVZvM1as5PDX50MD0F6n+7YR3v49WFuQahkpx_+SCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000087579057877ae18"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Pg_elByYWuaraf3KrtZn-3BVWYQ>
Subject: [Roll] Review of draft-koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-extension-02
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:38:24 -0000

Dear all,
        This is the review of draft-koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-extension-02.
Regards,

                    Diego Dujovne

Review
1. First, I woud say that sections 3, 4 and 5 are mostly concentrated on
the packet replication process. this text can be mostly removed
by referring to the pre-requisites draft on 6tisch.
2. "no TLV have been" should be "no TLV has been"
3. "option is included is shown" should be "option is included, is shown"
4. "is shown further expanded" should be "is shown expanded"
5. The idea "It does not make sense for this information to be
   aggregated due to the scalability issue created
   by the space required for many IPv6 addresses.
   Therefore, the PS MUST NOT be aggregated." is not
   clear. can you rephrase this expression? Why should
   aggregation be considered first?
6. "For reasons of clarity," -> "For clarity reasons,"






-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Profesor Asociado
Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125