[Roll] some small help needed. (was Re: formulating a plan to normalize secdir reviews of ROLL applicability statements)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 02 May 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6454D1A6F54 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1XBN4oM_D61x for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A761A0821 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C492002B for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:02:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 6467D63ABD; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDAD63AA2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 09:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: roll@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2994.1393771984@sandelman.ca>
References: <14216.1391615181@sandelman.ca> <2994.1393771984@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 09:01:21 -0400
Message-ID: <15441.1399035681@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/SvYb5MYmZB_obbm05EsKzDTjgPI
Subject: [Roll] some small help needed. (was Re: formulating a plan to normalize secdir reviews of ROLL applicability statements)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:01:32 -0000

I wrote this a few weeks ago.
  please see:
  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/QDrRuBQf1BBHvdskLi5PxUyqh38

I am still looking for someone to help me with three paragraphs for
the applicability statements.  I need help here because it is sometimes hard
to explain something that ones knows too well.


Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > The summary is that we simply have not been explicit enough about the
    > relationship between documents, and we need to insert some text into
    > each document explaining it's relationship to other documents.

    > I'm looking for someone to write that text: someone who has a fresh
    > take on this, and will hopefully make explicit the things that I
    > perhaps now regard as obvious.  I did a new slide, number: 27 of
    > http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/89/slides/slides-89-roll-1.pdf


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/