Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-home-routing-reqs as a ROLL WG document ?

Yes,

Although there is a point that probably bears discussion. In a multi- 
application network with sleeping end devices and resource-constrained  
routers, there is an end device management problem that is related to  
routing and might be considered as part of the routing solution. In  
short, it doesn't really make sense to rely on nearby routers to  
buffer arbitrary traffic for sleeping end devices. There are a number  
of possible solutions to this problem and not all of them involve the  
network layer but, if we are talking about "resource aware" routing  
then we might want to put in a requirement or two around this.

My $0.02US,

   z

On May 15, 2008, at 1:41 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
> Do you support the adoption of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brandt-roll-home-routing-reqs-01.txt 
>  as a ROLL WG document ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

Zachary Smith - CTO
http://www.daintree.net/
zsmith@daintree.net