Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-home-routing-reqs as a ROLL WG document ?

Thanks for your reply.

ps: that gives me the opportunity to clarify one thing though: by all means,
adopting a document as a WG document does not mean that the document is
ready for publication ! It just means that the WG agrees to take it as the
base document to address a WG item.

Thanks.

JP.

On 5/15/08 6:22 PM, "Zachary Smith" <zsmith@daintree.net> wrote:

> Yes,
> 
> Although there is a point that probably bears discussion. In a
> multi-application network with sleeping end devices and resource-constrained
> routers, there is an end device management problem that is related to routing
> and might be considered as part of the routing solution. In short, it doesn't
> really make sense to rely on nearby routers to buffer arbitrary traffic for
> sleeping end devices. There are a number of possible solutions to this problem
> and not all of them involve the network layer but, if we are talking about
> "resource aware" routing then we might want to put in a requirement or two
> around this.
> 
> My $0.02US,
> 
>   z
> 
> On May 15, 2008, at 1:41 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
>>  Dear WG,
>>  
>>  Do you support the adoption of
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brandt-roll-home-routing-reqs-01.tx
>> t as a ROLL WG document ?
>>  
>>  Thanks.
>>  
>>  JP. 
>>   _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>> 
>>  
>> Zachary Smith - CTO
>> http://www.daintree.net/
>> zsmith@daintree.net
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 