IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] closure text for ticket #97

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Wed, 11 April 2012 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=441eb7f02=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015E911E8102 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id txR3llyZfSGo for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip2mta.uwm.edu (ip2mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F26C11E80D9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEAJoPhk9/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABDhXK3DSNWNQINGQJZBoghrBGJfYEhgS+PLoEYBIhajRKQNoMF
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098301FD0B8; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:14:42 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShvQGOXsT2F2; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:14:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72951FD0B7; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:14:41 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:14:41 -0500
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
Message-ID: <2058754072.1901974.1334186081750.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <820013775.1852322.1333923401124.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [129.89.7.91]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.13_GA_2918 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.13_GA_2918)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] closure text for ticket #97
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:14:51 -0000

#97: A fixed value for DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME not OK for all P2P-RPL deployments.

Resolution:
------------------------
 Make DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME as well as MAX_DRO_RETRANSMISSIONS  configurable parameters.

Discussion:
-------------------------
 p25 :  o DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME: The time duration a target waits for the DRO-  ACK before retransmitting a DRO message. DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME has a
      value of 1 second.

 [Cedric]
 I'm not sure it is compliant with all RPL deployments.
 Could we adapt it to the characteristics of the network used ?

 [Mukul]
 I am OK with making DRO_ACK_WAIT_TIME as well as MAX_DRO_RETRANSMISSIONS  configurable parameters.

[Cedric2]
Safe enough.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email