IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] FW: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man (please note point on trickle multicast draft)

"Don Sturek" <d.sturek@att.net> Thu, 07 April 2011 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EE13A6916 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.293, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FnU5A20LF589 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D64533A690F for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 13:34:21 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.218] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 13:34:21 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 13:34:21 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 537851.24537.bm@omp1027.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 3860 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2011 13:34:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1302183261; bh=sFpml3fInM6Fpf78x0gWTZedl0Ge8J5dxqtOmUN7eYg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=n3EUZAgv+NDJvFmz1Imwjj55b3EYztY3ibPQdHEUKyllNktArTGw6Er3tVCEduC4Wxw7ybZgjtcIAAUfD8l2KAu5MemSH2m976h1RDwQbPIbHO94Hm/PPDTKMvClzUEZbuNk7/syJvR+xJVOMIOsKBu6CvMJZ+D4SI3GrA1urk4=
Received: from Studio (d.sturek@77.107.140.146 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 07 Apr 2011 06:34:21 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fvjol_aswBAraSJvMLe2r1XTzhBhbFxY8q8c3jo-
X-YMail-OSG: v7m_GEQVM1l_v1R8vu33_8MoOA7lkOHf9UDtXTWwGWCpSY. 3aRSMRWT0k6MEtampFgtqD_tNjtmKgfX22mI113t5Y6fSamRrh6G1yKgcPt3 4xeLpFB9kcnoo8AqqBkjVwTZDgMnBOM5Po1qvJr_be8lNePHG1Tn_hSFiHuK unDONUidL2HSm6prWbQ.6w7HkdlTFZ8olsSDzJtKz7T84cNcawkAq8OXt3Bq YtBep02ArY0WkvonRd0KW1z9JETsbK8qXMZAFP8bJfs7W6O5gA9MgdHscLb. tDB86y.xvRwcv.qyTGS05NNWiY8kNDB4FekvLAWRlRunoUQ--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
To: 'JP Vasseur' <jpv@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:34:17 -0700
Message-ID: <00e401cbf528$7f7ee270$7e7ca750$@sturek>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcvgB+WAjp8ESRgwQ0a1EmHlyn9YMAAAI+vQBUfxOFA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] FW: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man (please note point on trickle multicast draft)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: d.sturek@att.net
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:32:41 -0000

Hi JP,

Could we consider adding the draft below:   Trickle Multicast   to the ROLL
group as a working group document?

As you can see from below, the 6MAN group does not believe the scope of the
draft is appropriate for 6MAN and suggest ROLL as a better home.

We are using the Trickle Multicast draft in our ZigBee IP work.

Thanks,

Don Sturek


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Sturek [mailto:d.sturek@att.net] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 8:26 AM
To: 'roll@ietf.org'
Subject: FW: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man (please note point on
trickle multicast draft)

In checking on the status of 6MAN drafts related to ROLL RPL, I asked about
the trickle multicast draft currently in 6MAN.  Here is a link to the draft:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hui-6man-trickle-mcast/ 

Have a look below at the response from Brian Haberman.  What does the group
think about adopting this draft into ROLL RPL?

Don 

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Brian Haberman
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 8:18 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man

On 3/11/11 11:03 AM, Don Sturek wrote:
> Can I ask about the current WG status of the following drafts:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header/
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option/
> 

The WG Last Call completed for these documents.  There were some
comments that, according to the authors, have been resolved but not
incorporated into the document(s).

>  
> 
> Also, the following draft has not been adopted by WG (can it?):
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hui-6man-trickle-mcast/
> 

No one has made a request for the WG to adopt it.

> 
> We would also like to see the trickle multicast draft adopted by the
group.
> 

>From my brief read of the draft, I am not sure it belongs in 6MAN.  It
describes a multicast forwarding paradigm specific to low-power
networks. It would seem like ROLL is a better fit for this draft.

Regards,
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email