[Roll] Fwd: Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-02

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 29 October 2012 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB7221F857C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.355
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYSnb7EII7OE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4753221F8553 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube4.xs4all.net [194.109.20.200]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9TAipeY007018 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:44:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stokcons@xs4all.nl)
Received: from a82-95-140-48.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.140.48]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:44:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_5933f1d47f4f72ec9b3450dcd231ee76"
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:44:51 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: roll@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Message-ID: <49c0b45be05cf97ba606deae2b3288a3@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (viipuKRfRM79S7zAT5HfjH3FivcG7PFN)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-02
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:45:27 -0000

Dear WG,


Attached my suggestions for text modifications including some nits. I 
used the facilities of word to edit and comment text with traces.

When writing text about MC scope and MC domain, I was puzzled by the 
all MPL forwarders multicast address which removes the possibility to 
address a given multicast group. We expect multiple (possibly disjunct) 
MC groups in our wireless networks.
Also I failed to understand why encapsulation was necessary once the 
message was received by the seed.
To make it possible to configure the interface with one MC scope I 
added the possibility to use Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast 
Addresses (RFC 3306).


Probably, I overlooked many aspects which make the suggestions 
impractical, but I hope that the intention is clear.

Peter van der Stok

Michael Richardson schreef op 2012-10-25 23:30:
> I suggest that you propose specific text to the list to modify the
> document.