Re: [Roll] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 April 2021 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC013A209A; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qBFgdIZB0w3T; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D0C3A209B; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id j12so23817351edy.3; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGX4o0UGHEuZhxcpYRYyXaryiRapGLTY9hxtqYYHvMY=; b=Zd6RSUvovsW5viyBBE1cycSTIz0ezkGdV2FH1ihZTYwVQW6KgrAoiap2fWzLVm60YB mGCn1sY/DRLlGF+8uoQYQL76bybMjj+nRKUrIMrFl+IpHmSlRo6QumI6rIplSGuZ9m+X DAZemXVzQOKbDx3cjdwipMi9LJlNZVYdacf6ffUwCjv8zlbYVyoRvEitU3T7UiqoZg0k GKOgIjT/Hm/XceWVYIzhbIgzR7jF5MHn6VCWHpHP9qwtDJKuXrjFfg1H1SD/EX+JZzJj vdyufvKDwwc5C64+8d/I7zaE37IJD3+cVTxNTm9bc9W3VVRBgZONCDsysNVVAfLBo5cC zL2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGX4o0UGHEuZhxcpYRYyXaryiRapGLTY9hxtqYYHvMY=; b=nfGxOovSJdtvgLBjM3Mb7liYb63Lnap89d/lZdtOxzSLpG/uz+2gj3Hr6y3LDg1DhH IreZUWU32iE95y3seU1pis+jGQ7CxYSpCndulwxjB0WffWFuo7SMPp1wsewlZ9wDQ9GP m5GanIPaZxEjTKBIgzoYcM7Rv/BWOBlI2lwAJ0hI99bi+CV4t2hfvz1JEgThiKO88/X2 D10ls9hV3sc4Dk0ozesbLwsiga/5itUMr+E9h9jkKsGVo9Fw63Gxo/7u1T+5UFG9nzAw NiBBBBTAu7vSFgvc7KLwbYYtbQVxlt0KISCif+Ym0GAHcQJFMDh+wiGHTsET2zgAXhku 2jiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oNs+mSTjT4Sovx/LpJazenzX0A01iGdt4pFQUOnCLWMEBFvif E01KKB3Wg/51s7UyJ0drN6x44YvmtdGn7+6hyhsbm4CeJ5tVOA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx9/UJpcEBhsOqBfkdSQu0RdSKcGHTRNZIlCFoBV4cm83cDRTnt27NQfRZjs2UAB23tv3wlV+RabBQsaZP+xo=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d596:: with SMTP id r22mr11254081edq.344.1619003120598; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:19 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <29EDF026-9741-4864-AC0C-E8375E402D4C@cisco.com>
References: <161899828182.30762.17925223604861378275@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsw4a7cxEAURnB=pMYkzb42tqwX0MfOxBoM0gxQGDyGc_Q@mail.gmail.com> <29EDF026-9741-4864-AC0C-E8375E402D4C@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:05:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx7Lvks77MOY4_3t6i22+4cEaHT_A2wHrw4q72m2yCOQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl@ietf.org>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>, "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/fG6v7EcncTvTfe5zchUpgzWa-TA>
Subject: Re: [Roll] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_Discuss_on_draft-ietf-roll?= =?utf-8?q?-aodv-rpl-10=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:05:29 -0000

On April 21, 2021 at 6:51:06 AM, Eric Vyncke wrote:


Éric:

> - the P2P naming... The §4 of RFC 6550 indeed uses this really unusual
> meaning for point-to-point :-( May I suggest the document authors to add an
> explanation on this semantic in the terminology as well as in the abstract
> (as it needs to stand by itself) ?

It's not unusual for RPL networks. ;-)

The terminology section already includes an entry (P2P).  Is that
enough or do you think more is needed?

For the abstract, how about adding this as the second sentence (which
is similar to what is in the rfc6550 abstract)?

   A P2P traffic flow is one between devices inside the LLN.

   [Note that the first sentence already has the expanded version of P2P and
   LLN.]


Thanks!

Alvaro.