IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New Version Notificationfor draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-03.txt

Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu> Fri, 16 March 2012 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D6321F86C4 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QrZpUeQ6CO1 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs-smtp-3.Stanford.EDU (cs-smtp-3.Stanford.EDU [171.64.64.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7747521F86C2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [76.14.66.110] (helo=[192.168.0.111]) by cs-smtp-3.Stanford.EDU with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <pal@cs.stanford.edu>) id 1S8Z65-0006vv-0T; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:29:43 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <BDF2740C082F6942820D95BAEB9E1A84013B69A1@XMB-AMS-108.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:29:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B63B319D-EC04-4EDD-BB3F-CC1C577B3B8E@cs.stanford.edu>
References: <20120311013418.13049.33067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><CAErDfUQuU4YtEV69T_4wJtEucHjvmeGxeFhZYsHL=5qGxH6e0Q@mail.gmail.com> <000901cd01a1$52418340$f6c489c0$@uni-bremen.de> <BDF2740C082F6942820D95BAEB9E1A84013B69A1@XMB-AMS-108.cisco.com>
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Scan-Signature: 764eb63bb4c91aa8ddbf2de6f9e489d2
Cc: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New Version Notificationfor draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-03.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:29:46 -0000

On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:

> Hello Koojana  
> 
> I hope you're doing well : )
> 
> In your case an exponential backoff seems to make a lot of sense.
> 
> There is work about DIS tuning in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-goyal-roll-dis-modifications-00 
> 
> Maybe you can contribute?

Well, to be precise, the above document is not at all about DIS tuning; it's about tuning the responses to DIS messages.

That being said, it's probably useful to engage the TinyRPL developers to ask about their choice of DIS timing, and also ask other developers.

Phil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email