Re: [Roll] Way forward for draft-clausen-lln-rpl-experiences

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Wed, 16 May 2012 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A59021F8652 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YgCjVNBT3l9f for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA6721F864F for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=1103; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1337152691; x=1338362291; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=N9TpMNg9eMHXk6qu9x6VawxtIM6QKNxEfQAZQtJ7nmk=; b=Wisx4hPSIzmYM7AWUMJ8vJ9ox2Qq8iT9fX2rP3G4wcNfZ0lpZ1jBoe7q 4g7svBsG3NhxaymKk2cMEVq8NwoCwiF4c5KtCFSR074OZ/zhu95AypseB cDRT/3zuc/1FZ6FVh9Hfj6NOIHRCMWcEDYIothpDaqancGe5yhlaCqtI7 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkYFABZUs0+Q/khL/2dsb2JhbABEgx2wY4EHghUBAQEDARIBJz8FCwtGVwY1h2cFmxmgHosdhHVjBJV9hXWIYoFpgms
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,601,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="4567696"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2012 07:18:10 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4G7IAS9028591; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:18:10 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-201.cisco.com ([144.254.231.95]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 16 May 2012 09:18:10 +0200
Received: from [10.60.114.227] ([10.60.114.227]) by xfe-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 16 May 2012 09:18:09 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <258D7E2F-F0C7-49EA-B831-81070C86EDB3@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:18:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2257A578-B2DF-4145-8393-9BB5D7E1CFBD@cisco.com>
References: <258D7E2F-F0C7-49EA-B831-81070C86EDB3@thomasclausen.org>
To: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2012 07:18:09.0378 (UTC) FILETIME=[0BDA3C20:01CD3334]
Cc: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Way forward for draft-clausen-lln-rpl-experiences
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:18:12 -0000

Dear Thomas,

On May 11, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

> Dear JP, Michael, all
> 
> Upon JPs invitation, draft-clausen-lln-rpl-experiences was presented and discussed at the Paris meeting.
> 
> The authors consider the document complete and "done", and are looking to take it forward in the IETF 
> process for publication as "Informational RFC" in the very near future. 
> 
> We would therefore like to ask the WG chairs, if the ROLL WG is willing to accept and progress this 
> document towards publication?

Thanks for your suggestion. So far we haven't see a lot of discussion/interest from the WG but your request is
perfectly fair. So far there are no details on the scenarios and testing environments that led to the issues that 
you reported, thus I would suggest you to first include them so that people interested could be able to reproduce
it. Once the drat is updated, we'll be happy to pool the WG.

Does that make sense ?

Thanks.

JP and Michael.

> 
> Best,
> 
> Thomas, Ulrich, Yuichi, Jiazi and Axel