[Roll] [Errata Verified] RFC6550 (3895)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 24 February 2014 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14ED61A039E; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:42:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUbfAmHrrTKv; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DA91A033F; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DB4857FC39D; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:41:59 -0800 (PST)
To: lei.mou.uu@gmail.com, wintert@acm.org, pthubert@cisco.com, abr@sdesigns.dk, jhui@archrock.com, kelsey@ember.com, pal@cs.stanford.edu, kpister@dustnetworks.com, rstruik.ext@gmail.com, jpv@cisco.com, roger.alexander@cooperindustries.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140224084159.DB4857FC39D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:41:59 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/pMDc6Z6x93RgkjNOJa9qackX670
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:27:56 -0800
Cc: roll@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Roll] [Errata Verified] RFC6550 (3895)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:42:02 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6550,
"RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6550&eid=3895

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Lei Mou <lei.mou.uu@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2014-02-17
Verified by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 9.8

Original Text
-------------
1.  The DODAG Parent Address subfield of a Transmit Information
    option MUST be empty.

5. ...

   When a storing node generates a DAO, it uses the stored state of DAOs
   it has received to produce a set of RPL Target options and their
   associated Transmit Information options.


Corrected Text
--------------
1.  The DODAG Parent Address subfield of a Transit Information
    option MUST be empty.

5. ...

   When a storing node generates a DAO, it uses the stored state of DAOs
   it has received to produce a set of RPL Target options and their
   associated Transit Information options.

Notes
-----
There is no "Transmit Information option", It should be Transit Information option. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6550 (draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
Publication Date    : March 2012
Author(s)           : T. Winter, Ed., P. Thubert, Ed., A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, JP. Vasseur, R. Alexander
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG