Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I support as well,

Thanks

AB

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I support the work on DAO projection and would be willing to review it.
>
> This will bring value to a RPL based network.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
> On 12/08/16 08:49, "Roll on behalf of peter van der Stok" <
> [e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
> >opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the
> >last set of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will
> >be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.
> >
> >Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
> >
> >
> >  F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
> >      Root initiated routing state in RPL
> >
> >•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> >•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> >•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> >•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> >
> >
> >  G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
> >        Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
> >
> >  •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> >  •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> >  •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> >  •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> >
> >
> >It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the
> >drafts
> >
> >
> >Thank you very much,
> >
> >
> >  Peter and Ines
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Roll mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>