Re: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 20 May 2013 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5816E21F926E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0BMERbp7MSW3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9563821F8618 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57049 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1UeRMk-0003nb-Li; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:47:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: mariainesrobles@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:47:10 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/111#comment:1
Message-ID: <083.fba384d0b5a2297f5e8b5fae741ce269@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <068.d297e97474c3aa6d3b0200f33881db3c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 111
In-Reply-To: <068.d297e97474c3aa6d3b0200f33881db3c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mariainesrobles@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:47:13 -0000

#111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear


Comment (by mariainesrobles@gmail.com):

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: Jonathan Hui (johui) <johui@cisco.com>
 Date: 2013/5/20
 Subject: Re: #113: MPL Processing Section


 MPL and RPL are independent protocols that both target LLNs.  MPL
 addresses multicast forwarding in LLNs, while RPL addresses unicast
 routing and forwarding in LLNs.

 --
 Jonathan Hui

-- 
----------------------------------------+--------------------------------
 Reporter:  abdussalambaryun@gmail.com  |       Owner:  Abdussalam Baryun
     Type:  enhancement                 |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                       |   Milestone:
Component:  trickle-mcast               |     Version:
 Severity:  Active WG Document          |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  Multicast, RPL, Trickle     |
----------------------------------------+--------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/111#comment:1>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>