[Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear
"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sat, 26 January 2013 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1266321F8859 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:43:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nW8lRfp7nLm2 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A70121F882B for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43600 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1Tz8qd-0001zz-5H; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:43:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:43:19 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/111
Message-ID: <068.d297e97474c3aa6d3b0200f33881db3c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 111
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:43:21 -0000
#111: MPL relation with RPL is not clear I want to understand/see an example or clarification of the relation between RPL and MPL protocols, or how can a RPL router use the MPL. How does the MPL help in reducing energy consumption in forwarding and/or routing. Please advise, AB -- ----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com | Owner: Abdussalam Baryun Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: trickle-mcast | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: Multicast, RPL, | Trickle ----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/111> roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
- [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is not … roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is … roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is … roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #111: MPL relation with RPL is … roll issue tracker