Re: [Roll] I-D When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6-

Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Sat, 27 June 2015 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293251B3322; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MY4y9CRh2dVL; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2235E1B331F; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgjx7 with SMTP id x7so32224361wgj.2; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=Suos764IX40JKY5QtGn7pXnFlZzMYFabPLcJ25jz2tU=; b=BfRHcXoQ8/7POkojWnstelMzJFCstyVrsXs1JMMATL9pj2gJ7WF1lkxQ8SkeZi3mhu tFQmplkClo3Kta6Vu3+o+gPVa37WSzAItntqyojUGH+WjsH8tzE/jCfUw4UNZ4hzu0WL k5l0DxracHfw0WgLGGEBoffpQjH2cTrxIYalY7abGn3tggAKgtTb/04kc0o8CuUcfNSs AqJUHFbs3armVfiNkCy27ZeU7T/TqQIrYMY3dKC/gtUs3NOKLtAjg++YicC1sgSHWKS9 yT9ELCnpcSo/e7/f0TbJ02VTqEonp5ao5mLtn/upXrWFRoL8uo8U5pfFr7U/j4dI2MQb 4Iqg==
X-Received: by 10.194.234.40 with SMTP id ub8mr10819354wjc.21.1435398426722; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.134.146 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUc7u-V84kN6bT-+4xLRiTMeLu+QcF+BJWG0AjW594GTQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUc7u-V84kN6bT-+4xLRiTMeLu+QcF+BJWG0AjW594GTQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:46:47 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aqPH0i44O66NC9DrHVPtngN_aMU
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-eXTe=b2kwBMGy8szNhN1LW_LV9MUEXA2+HPAEmk+SVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493c7c560a2905197cbd1c
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/xpa8xdDctbnXi-8j_ZRuzWwW3p0>
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6-
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:47:10 -0000

Ines,

Great to see this I-D exists!

CC'ing the 6TISCH ML, as these questions have been discussed extensively
there as well.
We will verify that the rules you describe as followed
in draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal and in the test specifications for the
upcoming 6TiSCH plugtest.
Give us a couple of days to review and provide feedback.

Thomas

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please find a draft related to our work item:
>
> "- Details about when to use RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6
> encapsulation."
>
> We are requesting for comments and for additional authors.
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
>
> Michael and Ines.
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txtDate: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:09:29 -0700From:
> internet-drafts@ietf.orgTo: Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>om>,
> Michael C. Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>ca>, Maria Ines Robles <
> maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>gt;, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
> >
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Maria Ines Robles and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:		draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo
> Revision:	00
> Title:		When to use RFC 6553, 6554 and IPv6-in-IPv6
> Document date:	2015-06-27
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		9
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-robles-roll-useofrplinfo-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document states different cases where RFC 6553, RFC 6554 and
>    IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation is required to set the bases to help
>    defining the compression of RPL routing information in LLN
>    environments.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>