Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Security in the Internet
Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Mon, 20 September 2021 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C43F3A104D; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4egc6QBQogSD; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74ECB3A104A; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id w1so19791482ilv.1; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iHUkKoDaRfvIiAJ1B2ocky6pZfmfUtlPxBj4pHXWWig=; b=dayTQ6cbyfuUwoMYye3emr8SUIt9D+JM5rZpsgtiagyf6fdeLhIIQ+XO3Nx7g4qqMp X27TXqnX4lx6a31WY2gFRqJB/xGLEyBeUacelw3TGkW5QithYAc9nKFBP7pEY0Ll8387 tMH/eVvOIbWk0lYGIbChzT+XtFMe9R+CuR4oNExs80mA2giAPbnvvLLPtY9nMq/mRRFY OrcHdBme/3O1VkEJ7YadbHIIrMY+D1vTNQ7AJkICO/xxQHmWiFnm3RH1+0TueDnSTlJV l/D/1cHdK89Hj7Ra/ZcTm585hMu8rU0kkWUjcw5sWGAZtf0OkcUMFz3IoolAnq3xcfZp KPww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iHUkKoDaRfvIiAJ1B2ocky6pZfmfUtlPxBj4pHXWWig=; b=bBX6OngcRvQL9CHO5uTQuu8m5ytkrWC/GkqauVvttkiAf4yDFwetCid/RQwqGpaT6x bj7qSFTzF6/4ICER4IzXI0IyonRCd4IhfPNTYK2bOt8Xp+jC5/HnC1Jm582hIOrmPmO0 xiFOtVZb6bobn7mZ0LErDqvXc2ti8GrflZclb89zT1qcpnciKA4kajjFJa8bGuZRtjB5 pTSCBJpOcyqB31lqZ2IYxPAeq26vh8D2mdQO2R66APBFubF1GUfGvNiwsJXxsphtrtEm EzPZtqjk58aVdA3mrpWNMfqanVDxsBwEid9z2GhPcc6aU4pJTPSdkHrF4DmVW1YasgC3 JiDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530J71LyRPHmefumH1fl06hYsYekIBB0a9kpoAjRHnNZ66Nr6bds YpDAmMayLoq60omSzEv9SmAVc/bbyuREUsX3vEM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGZNs+rVzw+4vIY2kkoR6Za7RN0yxhSQWy48F1E0Tiy/aI47h6tpkQ8gJcZeNoXAs7naXRXk2+rRXL3Qkd3AE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c744:: with SMTP id y4mr17627199ilp.288.1632162022526; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1df201d7aae4$41af6c80$c50e4580$@olddog.co.uk> <SJ0PR14MB4792121CABA02012FD870B22C3DE9@SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <01b401d7ac7d$e3e05ba0$aba112e0$@olddog.co.uk> <cdc0cfac-4961-0dc3-c2aa-92018cf8900d@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <cdc0cfac-4961-0dc3-c2aa-92018cf8900d@labn.net>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:19:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hM_S+O+pN9ATb=nkiv+4ZteikhPFOGzAg5ym-JhuoqbGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Security in the Internet
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, routing-discussion@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000091918405cc71551d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/fnvExJQHMtXxKPr6zbuLq4NBFEE>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General Discussion list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:20:29 -0000
send .ics too many time zones ;-) -- tny On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 1:36 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > Thanks Adrian -- maybe this is the first “IETF virtual interim side > meeting” ;-) > On 9/18/2021 7:11 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi Lou, > > > > Yes, it’s just something that Dan and I put together in the context of our > work at https://github.com/danielkinguk/sarah/ > > Our aim is, periodically, to bring together some key research work on or > related to routing and addressing that we think would be of benefit to > IETFers and others in the field. At the same time, we want to try to > trigger discussion about the nature of research into routing and > addressing, and uncover some of the important questions that are not always > given enough attention. > > > > I think the side meeting is reasonably established (at IETF meetings), but > they are meetings of convenience and, while they typically carry the IETF > contributors’ rules, they are not formally part of the IETF. > > > > But I am unclear on the feasibility of “IETF virtual interim side > meetings”. > > > > So, what we are doing is having a small workshop (just 90 minutes) > following much of the same procedure as would happen at an IETF side > meeting, but it is not an IETF meeting. > > > > Nevertheless, I have a slide that begins… > > Note Well – This is *Not* an IETF meeting > > But let’s apply IETF policies for patents and code of conduct in this > meeting > > …and then goes on to the usual BCP79 material etc. > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > *From:* routing-discussion <routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org> > <routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Lou Berger > *Sent:* 18 September 2021 11:50 > *To:* adrian@olddog.co.uk; routing-discussion@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org > *Cc:* 'King, Daniel' <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk> <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk> > *Subject:* Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Security in the > Internet > > > > Hi Adrian > > Interesting stuff! > > > (Please note, this is not an IETF/IRTF meeting, but we thought the > IETF/IRTF community would be interested.) > > Who is the sponsoring organization for this meeting? > > If just you and Dan, why not just run it as an IETF interim with rules > (e.g. IPR) we all understand? > > Thanks, > Lou > > ---------- > On September 16, 2021 6:19:30 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote: > > Hi, > > We've put together a small workshop on Evolving Routing Security in the > Internet to be held on Thursday 30th September at 3pm UTC [1] > > Our objective is to bring relevant information and research to the routing > community and spark discussion about routing research. > > Attendance is open and free. > > Meeting materials will be at > > https://github.com/danielkinguk/sarah/tree/main/conferences/security-worksho > p > > We will use Webex : > > https://htf-paris.my.webex.com/htf-paris.my-en/j.php?MTID=mc8bb1a7bcda855d14 > 060678f65272117 and stream the meeting on YouTube at > https://youtu.be/V9CZC42BTDc > > Our agenda for this meeting features three presentations and a period for > open discussion. > * Mutually Agreed Norms for Routing Security > Andrei Robachevsky, Internet Society > * Lightweight blockchain assisted secure routing of swarm UAS networking > Houbing Song and Jian Wang, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University > * On-Demand Blind Packet Forwarding > Irfan Simsek, University of Duisburg-Essen > > We hope you can fit this into your schedule. > > (Please note, this is not an IETF/IRTF meeting, but we thought the > IETF/IRTF > community would be interested.) > > Best, > Adrian and Dan > > [1] > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210930T150000&p1 > =1440&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_et&p4=tz_bst&p5=tz_cest&p6=tz_cst-china > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
- A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Security … Adrian Farrel
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Acee Lindem (acee)
- RE: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Adrian Farrel
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Lou Berger
- RE: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Adrian Farrel
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Lou Berger
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Tony Przygienda
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Greg Mirsky
- RE: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Adrian Farrel
- Re: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Loa Andersson
- RE: A virtual "interim" on Evolving Routing Secur… Adrian Farrel