IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

"Larry J. Blunk" <ljb@merit.edu> Tue, 13 January 2004 17:03 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA25546 for <rps-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:03:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgRwS-00053B-UH; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:03:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AgRwI-00051g-1b for rps@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:02:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA25508 for <rps@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:02:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgRwG-0004vi-00 for rps@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:02:48 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AgRut-0004kQ-00 for rps@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:01:23 -0500
Received: from segue.merit.edu ([198.108.1.41]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AgRsd-0004P2-00 for rps@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:59:03 -0500
Received: from ablate.merit.edu (ablate.merit.edu [198.108.62.151]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0885DE6E; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:59:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]
From: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb@merit.edu>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: rps@ietf.org, rpslng@ripe.net
In-Reply-To: <E1AgRPu-0002HL-Ti@ran.psg.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401020943330.8873-100000@netcore.fi> <1074010929.3795.45.camel@ablate.merit.edu> <E1AgRPu-0002HL-Ti@ran.psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Merit Network, Inc.
Message-Id: <1074013404.3795.52.camel@ablate.merit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rps-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rps-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rps>, <mailto:rps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Policy System <rps.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rps>, <mailto:rps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/rps/>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:03:24 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:29, Randy Bush wrote:
> then let me register my support for the issues and approaches
> marc raises.  perhaps the system is for the benefit of operations
> more than the ease of registries?
> 
> randy
> 

   There are a number of operators that run their own registries (e.g.
Level3, Verio, C&W, etc.).   Ping Lu (formerly of C&W) was very vocal
about preserving the syntax of existing RPSL attributes.

 -Larry



_______________________________________________
Rps mailing list
Rps@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rps

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email