Re: [RPSEC] about the charter and work items

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Russ said that he was going to check about the status of charter changes.
> I'd like also to mention one possible additional work item.  At the
> mike at the last IETF, I mentioned taking on the draft that looks at
> damage if MD5 is broken.  The response was that this was probably the
> OSPF vulnerability analysis mentioned in the slides.  (Unfortunately,
> this comment was too small to make it to the minutes, so I'm working
> off memory here.)
> 
> But I was speaking of draft-manral-rpsec-existing-crypto-02.txt,
> not the recently announced draft-ietf-rpsec-ospf-vuln-02.txt
> 
> I believe that there is value in looking at the damage to various
> protocols that use keyed MD5 as an authentication mechanism - as an
> impetus to change and as a warning to operators while MD5 is still used.
> So I'm in favor of taking on the Manral draft.

I've been getting the ospf vulnerability draft and the existing crypto
drafts mixed up--how about if we ask both to be presented in Montreal,
and then think about (take a hum about) taking them on as WG items? I
think we might have already covered this space before (in terms of
taking them on as WG items), but it might be good to do a level set of
where we are, and what we need to work on.

:-)

Russ

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEmzDRER27sUhU9OQRAt4RAJ9M62fBRabHyoDjPU3xGMycU8M9gACdEcpQ
2RzZrc/n+LTY/RVrJHogy28=
=V/b+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec