Re: Status of Requirements for IP Routers RFC

Mark Andrews <mandrews@alias.com> Tue, 26 April 1994 13:13 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07096; 26 Apr 94 9:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07092; 26 Apr 94 9:13 EDT
Received: from Jessica.Stanford.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07528; 26 Apr 94 9:13 EDT
Received: from yonge.csri.toronto.edu (yonge.csri.toronto.edu [128.100.1.2]) by jessica.Stanford.EDU (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA22443 for <ietf-rreq@jessica.stanford.edu>; Tue, 26 Apr 1994 05:50:35 -0700
Received: from alias by yonge.csri.toronto.edu with UUCP id <14422>; Tue, 26 Apr 1994 08:49:54 -0400
Received: from dino.alias.com by barney.alias.com with SMTP id AA28859 (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2 for tli@cisco.com); Tue, 26 Apr 94 08:33:10 -0400
Received: by dino.alias.com id AA15526 (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2 for ietf-rreq@jessica.stanford.edu); Tue, 26 Apr 94 08:33:01 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mark Andrews <mandrews@alias.com>
Message-Id: <9404261233.AA15526@dino.alias.com>
Subject: Re: Status of Requirements for IP Routers RFC
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 1994 08:33:01 -0400
Cc: ietf-rreq@jessica.stanford.edu
In-Reply-To: <199404260711.AAA01714@lager.cisco.com>; from "Tony Li" at Apr 26, 94 3:11 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL8]

> The latest version of the document is in
> draft-ietf-rreq-iprouters-require-01.txt in your favorite Internet
> Drafts repository.  As this draft is obviously already obsolete, the
> WG has decided to issue this as a historical RFC, and produce a new,
> up-to-date version.
> 
> This is not yet available as a draft.
> 
> Tony

Tony, do we have any idea when a version of IPng is going to emerge? I'm
silently wondering if by the time we get a new routers RFC out of drafts
and into the standards track, how soon until it is obsolete like RFC 1009?