Danvers Headsup

bmanning@isi.edu Mon, 06 February 1995 19:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07217; 6 Feb 95 14:00 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07209; 6 Feb 95 14:00 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11580; 6 Feb 95 14:00 EST
Received: from zed.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA15499>; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 10:41:45 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 10:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199502061841.AA03616@zed.isi.edu>
Received: by zed.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA03616>; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 10:41:07 -0800
Subject: Danvers Headsup
To: rreq@isi.edu
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 10:41:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 753

> I've tentatively scheduled you for Tuesday night 1930-2200.  If
> the social gets scheduled then, I'll move you to Monday night.
> 
>  >> I'd like to get a RREQ WG scheduled for some evening early in the week.

The reason for this mtg is to catch any leftovers from a planned 
last call.

Here is our desired agenda between now and then (based on Fred's 
yeoman efforts in the editing chair)

> draft hits the streets on or before the 15th.
> two weeks email review then we get it published as a std-track RFC
>     one month before IETF. It goes to last call.
> The WG meets in Davers (5min or so) to say we've met goal and
>     catch any last call flack.
> 

So, get those comments into Fred -NOW-.  We will be living w/ them for
a while.


--bill