Re: [rrg] RANGER(S)

["Templin, Fred L" <[e-mail]>]

Heiner,

 

> I have never understood either that inter- and intra-domain routing architectures have to be such orthogonal.

> So whatever I proposed or supported so far was aiming to a consistent architectural framework, too.

> Routing, which is not based on address summarization, would make sense inside of intra-domain-networks as well.

 

Do these other approaches show how they recurse from the Internet core

all the way to a singleton node as the limiting factor for recursion - or even

to virtual networks within a singleton node?

 

Do the other approaches provide for discovery and utilization of multiple

border routers?

 

Do they have fully-articulated specifications for automatic EID and RLOC

address configuration?

 

Do they support multihoming?

 

Provider-independent addressing?

 

IPv6 deployment?

 

Traffic engineering?

 

Secure redirection?

 

Ingress filtering?

 

What about mobility?

 

MTU handling for tunnels?

 

_Do the other approaches have their base mechanisms widely deployed

in shipping implementations for many years, and with many millions of

users?_

 

Is maturity important to this group? What about completeness?

 

Fred

[e-mail] 

 

 

________________________________

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:31 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [rrg] RANGER(S)

 

In einer eMail vom 19.05.2009 01:26:57 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [e-mail]:

	but in our
	experience RANGER(S) is the only proposal with a consistent
	architectural framework that applies recursively in a
	"network-of-networks" fashion from the global Internet core
	all the way outward to even the simplest of edge networks.

I have never understood either that inter- and intra-domain routing architectures have to be such orthogonal.

So whatever I proposed or supported so far was aiming to a consistent architectural framework, too.

Routing, which is not based on address summarization, would make sense inside of intra-domain-networks as well.

 

Heiner