Re: [rrg] RANGER(S)
HeinerHummel@aol.com Tue, 19 May 2009 07:26 UTC
Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8F328C13B for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2009 00:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQ4FYIzGPFe4 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2009 00:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr-d01.mx.aol.com (imr-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D4228C136 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2009 00:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-d01.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-34a125f95114; Tue, 19 May 2009 03:28:21 -0400
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id p.d49.472abe45 (48600); Tue, 19 May 2009 03:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <d49.472abe45.3743ba4b@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:31:23 -0400
To: Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com, rrg@irtf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1242718283"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.136
Subject: Re: [rrg] RANGER(S)
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 07:26:59 -0000
In einer eMail vom 19.05.2009 01:26:57 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com: but in our experience RANGER(S) is the only proposal with a consistent architectural framework that applies recursively in a "network-of-networks" fashion from the global Internet core all the way outward to even the simplest of edge networks. I have never understood either that inter- and intra-domain routing architectures have to be such orthogonal. So whatever I proposed or supported so far was aiming to a consistent architectural framework, too. Routing, which is not based on address summarization, would make sense inside of intra-domain-networks as well. Heiner
- Re: [rrg] RANGER(S) HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] RANGER(S) Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] RANGER(S) HeinerHummel