[RRG] Re: Some concern about the flat label as identifier
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 17 March 2008 11:17 UTC
Envelope-to: rrg-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:18:51 +0000
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:17:53 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
Cc: 'Routing Research Group' <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: [RRG] Re: Some concern about the flat label as identifier
Message-ID: <20080317111753.GA15301@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: NIC France
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: > I have a concern about the business model of the HIP which uses HIT > (flat label) as host identifier. It seems it is more correct to say that the identifier is the HI, not the HIT. > how can the id/loc mapping management been shared among different > countries and different service providers? There are several ways. One is to use the DNS (draft-ietf-hip-dns) with all its limitations but also its strengths. Another one is the use of a DHT (draft-ahrenholz-hiprg-dht). The DHT spreads the identifiers "at random". If you prefer more control on the placement of keys, see draft-mathy-lisp-dht. > I don't believe it's acceptable from both political and economic > aspects that all the mapping management is dominated by a single > company, such as Skype. But certainly nobody suggested so. -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
- [RRG] Some concern about the flat label as identi… Xu Xiaohu
- [RRG] Re: Some concern about the flat label as id… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [RRG] re: Some concern about the flat label as id… Xu Xiaohu
- RE: [RRG] re: Some concern about the flat label a… Randall Atkinson