Re: [rrg] [ILNP] Current state of the implementation

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558B821F8659 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iiZdk+iEHLIB for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9737C21F8699 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so7610443qcs.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=TfS511avJVCcAvw4fDrcZWJ9W9N+60RSpptd8/Wh690=; b=YrDNLHd4hSBS+MBGWY5Fs3wlamRZkR/0EBPp7xOghsEQ+UHVv52EneFcJM+uKkthyI Tw0qfnJPZxTU+rZ8kR2+qWwqGRk5B72ObxuA87gssoSv0pl/IotTIBkPYfH6Ric70eOz S0X6YTFfbYj9zqUcPrXVKkrH3TG/mWmcC42BGniQamFKJB22wkLodFzJcMLHVrfLtufP xLn0gm9+9epBSmTN+8Q/SkT+CNmJvaxIztmkBhsqVloj/+kxeev1eJPUDJEe7PiuOeva CWmQ4Ii12kithow8V4AjL/5DgWXRG81VHeRJXRi56Tx0+V4HN435stcCL2CeKEIespvi BCAw==
Received: by 10.224.58.137 with SMTP id g9mr72604688qah.83.1341846049245; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.12] (pool-74-110-100-136.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [74.110.100.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gb7sm61913061qab.12.2012.07.09.08.00.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:00:46 -0400
Message-Id: <2AF59B53-AE2A-468A-A903-55F4CAC51E48@gmail.com>
To: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@irtf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [rrg] [ILNP] Current state of the implementation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:00:35 -0000

Stephane,

  A proof-of-concept overlay implementation was done a while back.  
In fact, some aspects of the current ILNP protocol specifications 
(e.g. having acknowledgements for Locator Updates) were driven 
in part by experimental results from that overlay proof-of-concept 
implementation.  So far as I know, that overlay is not publicly 
available at present.  

Results from that overlay implementation were reported, in part, 
in a paper in IEEE MILCOM 2011:

<http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~saleem/papers/2011/milcom2011/milcom2011-bak2011.pdf>

  I understand that there are two independent implementations 
of ILNP underway at present, one in FreeBSD and another in Linux.  
I am not part of either implementation team.

  Of course, from an IRTF (or IETF) perspective, there is 
no requirement for a freely distributable implementation.  
Clearly, it would be pleasant if one or more did exist, 
so that a wider array of folks could validate ILNP operation 
for themselves.

Cheers,

Ran