[Rswg] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call comments on draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-10 from the RPC
Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Fri, 12 July 2024 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C253C157915 for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tfQxM6VWB5w for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C135AC151551 for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-426526d30aaso14871455e9.0 for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1720800293; x=1721405093; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TsZ8vH/iaEfNLoZxUom8tr5VIUsGn4u5kLg+dGysVVE=; b=dF1+Wwir8coS40zLqleju3WDef4czkoccgomWhgVNR2KAq1bqcnbjfonP2+ggKpxL/ dSgu2wm/LP+UVzQUI9hwqAmfh3kwF8u/SGVVyFokfkObKGMSumlBxYkUqrI2n7Py2hzC XIRPGrgQyPPJzNqpvylEtSF+dZk4kurFxhB+GHKC19tcTw+yDAPUvmrwmoj8u/8ZGFCz PNfl2VU6nnFNXb5k9+MtYPT9oZQOZCEUQtUZXvc5XLBLqI5/9nHN0NRROC7hI2BOkJb1 cIfwKzH68dkeiajOlugyaGCKqw1+F1hBwOTLrXmxVF3NYs3bjonPBxcCDHFgbOO9vs3s Yleg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720800293; x=1721405093; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TsZ8vH/iaEfNLoZxUom8tr5VIUsGn4u5kLg+dGysVVE=; b=himvuGpGSYOYMbdMXFrPCwTZ7duxR+8NZ74iqwQx9T5et7ubB9+jh5bh1pR/+1yGOv 8Ri4CDa/+pFu8woBxIk5Yq5EVHl6Xl6H/Ias8v720COBm6zzdBk3oKQIphmnR5wqiW26 M99YmZH2+Z5Q3oB4op058uW5tkK5pbxASeFuzcmiRlF7LNHzChynr7JC0NT14i3gpM+J +pC4zzgaZhTg206oAIlpXWKRgVfpjqh0U0bv4Zt9Ih/O9wDD1dux7I+KBDea64UTb9PK MCcGOLRRWLd2v3haSQcnaHCMxB50dmSS2ShRSDQZh3F9Zv8eI7EbfuCLPPoPjUZo8509 PSdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyT2aPZh49houYpWbN+sDbF/L2+1VJr54ZOc130jCn31tr3Qyhl nYK59Y3YhJug4RGUQfu4L3iM3GHIRqF9cPFrShhD7gBAnHUN+3gkVXdiT4jNxwMpAS+g56d7FtV KGNvlWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHEbIDFfAbRfcRVxzRdbrqkU+TdT1s+escdeqPKq16ttMqnR6sbsADdrBXvq8tYUFz8lbFqw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:245:b0:426:6fd3:1547 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-426707cf19fmr76725055e9.2.1720800292985; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([92.27.125.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4279f2cc286sm27954105e9.33.2024.07.12.09.04.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <EBCAC3E9-8405-47AF-8885-DD1140686E2C@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_05E2966C-A826-4CA0-8E60-91164BEE41D5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:04:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <E423CF6F-24C3-4A4D-89B4-A38757EDBCFC@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
References: <E423CF6F-24C3-4A4D-89B4-A38757EDBCFC@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: RWEYWJIYFUPMWWCAFGWLAHV524FKUGU5
X-Message-ID-Hash: RWEYWJIYFUPMWWCAFGWLAHV524FKUGU5
X-MailFrom: jay@staff.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: RSWG <rswg@rfc-editor.org>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rswg] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call comments on draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-10 from the RPC
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group (RSWG)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/piIOX2cWE9t4p48CWZZDfX6ep_k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rswg-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rswg-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rswg-leave@rfc-editor.org>
> On 12 Jul 2024, at 16:15, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote: > >> 3) Section 1.3 (not related to terminology) >> >> Current: >> The first RFC to be published following the guidance of the group of >> RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in November >> 2019. >> >> Suggested (because the first RFC published was RFC 8651): >> The first RFC (by date order) to be published following the the guidance of the group of >> RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8651], published in October 2019. >> >> Or: >> The first RFC (by RFC number order) to be published following the the guidance of the group of >> RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in November 2019. > > Ouch. I (Paul) carefully checked this, but obviously did so incorrectly. We'll go with the first version (8651). This might seem trivial, but I think it’s better to go with RFC number order, not date order, and therefore RFC 8650. The reasoning is because it’s more important to tell people at what point in the series the formats change, not precisely when the change happened. Jay -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director exec-director@ietf.org
- [Rswg] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call comments on… Carsten Bormann
- [Rswg] Response to RSAB Last Call comments on dra… Paul Hoffman
- [Rswg] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call comments on… Jay Daley
- [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call c… Paul Hoffman
- [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: Response to RSAB Last Call c… Pete Resnick