IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 05 August 2015 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987E81A1B49; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GiOBXOEMGxbc; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D878C1A1A60; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79356d000006281-8d-55c20dfa7677
Received: from ESESSHC021.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7B.BC.25217.AFD02C55; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:22:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.36]) by ESESSHC021.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:22:02 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQz3+KPHF90ErmFk+lirKPCDNxv539Y5Rg
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:02 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B348E9691@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <20150805130607.20844.70680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150805130607.20844.70680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rvc376FQg8VvOC2uTfjObHHh0mpm ix3PG1gtZvyZyGzR8/YGi8Xaf+3sFtP3XmN3YPdY232VzWPJkp9MAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJ XBl3G28zF/xnqbi66xJTA+MP5i5GDg4JAROJpWvEuxg5gUwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAkcZZSYebWR BcJZxChx6vQLRpAGNgELie5/2iANIgKeEg/7ToHVMAvsZJaY8HAOO0hCWKBG4tKN2YwQRbUS d3c3skHYRhLbL04Gq2ERUJE4evwUmM0r4CvRtfcaK4gtJOAo0XKsEyzOKeAkcfzHQTCbEei6 76fWMIHYzALiEreezGeCuFpAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsRYmdZ9uZIep1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4 mhlir6DEyZlPWCYwis1CMnYWkpZZSFpmIWlZwMiyilG0OLW4ODfdyEgvtSgzubg4P08vL7Vk EyMw4g5u+W21g/Hgc8dDjAIcjEo8vAp5B0OFWBPLiitzDzFKc7AoifPO2JwXKiSQnliSmp2a WpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoFx4Tbv9EtORrN73xbcn9yps/qcsZGMxcuQkKSkOw45i09Oy9H3 n3E+oE+XhXXvli3z3z3/8f/F1GzDl3nbnAudN7xgCzG4UuFQW3i7RGL1Y98lsSLVr4/8bJLp WH41qqjiyP5D07J0dA5verxzfv6Bdzmr1qgfV3Q+Y1izf5mns+3N5SxqX+5zKLEUZyQaajEX FScCAGN9hhCZAgAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/05xySNVHxzsFRBiCFiHx9etZNEw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.shepherd@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.ad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:22:07 -0000

Hi Stephen,

>(2) WebRTC does not require STUN or TURN servers for some calls, even if it does for many. Why is it ok to require such a server be present in all calls (which I think this means) espcially 
>when that means exposing additional meta-data (calling parties in a case where the servers weren't needed and call duration in all
>cases) to those servers when that is not always necessary? 

Could you please refer to the text which you think mandates STUN or TURN servers?

If there are no NATs, the STUN requests can be sent between the endpoints, without STUN or TURN servers.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email