IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Wed, 24 October 2012 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722AC21F8A8C; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.430, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2dBGQGmzD3Z; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A084021F8A2F; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail122-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.248) by CO1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.243.66.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:19 +0000
Received: from mail122-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156075400BC; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 2
X-BigFish: PS2(zzc85fh14ffIzz1202h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh34h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail122-co1: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail122-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail122-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1351071616952657_28723; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.240]) by mail122-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3737BC0065; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by CO1EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (10.243.66.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:14 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.69]) by BL2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.40]) with mapi id 14.16.0233.001; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:13 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "video-codec@ietf.org" <video-codec@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Incoming liaison statement from MPEG
Thread-Index: AQHNscuQrKWwUbiVwUGukf/J2FnY8g==
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:12 +0000
Message-ID: <FDBFA77C7400C74F87BC297393B53E3525930387@BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.5]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_FDBFA77C7400C74F87BC297393B53E3525930387BL2PRD0710MB349_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:20 -0000

Hi all,
Please find attached an incoming liaison statement from MPEG.  It's short, and therefore attached.  For those not familiar with MPEG's terminology: "AVC" stands for "Advanced Video Codec" and is used in certain circles for what other people know as H.264, and sometimes, depending on context, only for the non-scalable and non-multiview profiles of H.264.  (H.264 is the ITU designation for the joint standard).  MPEG-4 part 29, or WebVC is, as described in the statement, what most people know as "constrained baseline H.264", i.e. H.264 baseline without the rarely used tools known as Arbitrary Slice Order, Flexible Macroblock Order, and Redundant Slices.
Also, in order to avoid possible confusion, let me emphasize that this liaison statement comes from the standardization body known as MPEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 ) and not from the licensing administrator known as MPEG-LA.
Regards,
Stephan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email