Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Sat, 24 September 2011 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8A521F8AF9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.642
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.642 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzBdYy7e6i1C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF1A21F8ACA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so2630075vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.175.229 with SMTP id cd5mr4719723vdc.363.1316898908149; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.94.200 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E7E47D1.9040100@db.org>
References: <CALiegfnf3=mPAupRtjoqz+fNfxT5V8yivoQB+bgrvAVWp5CVog@mail.gmail.com> <4E7E47D1.9040100@db.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:15:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnY62TZs_=fCzqYqfObB+9yY93v5jfgOjMjtd+oYNgoBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: "Alfred E. Heggestad" <aeh@db.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:12:32 -0000

2011/9/24 Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh@db.org>rg>:
> "ICE does not work" is not correct. ICE will still "work" even if both
> peers are behind NAT. the media will simply be relayed via a TURN server,
> and not flow directly between peers.

Yes, that's exactly what I said in my second paragraph :)


> the TURN server credentials should be provisioned by the service provider

And is that estandarized within rtcweb?

Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>